La Biblia y el Color de Piel: "La Raza Pura"

Talking about Jesus the Black Christ and The Inferior Race.

This past February 10, 2024, we were analyzing via Zoom a doctrine that apparently is gaining popularity in what we know as the world of Christianity and/or in the spiritual world. Above is the video of this presentation, which also includes a question and answer section, where we could all participate.

NOTE: This written study is an extension of the video study presented here. It also presents a counterpart to a study that—incidentally, Miguel did as a counterpart—about this video presented above.

En esta ocasión presentaré un breve resumén escrito de lo presentado por Zoom, mientras cubrimos algunos puntos importantes que complementan el tema. Además, como tal se hizo en el video, evaluaremos dos documentos que presentan el origen de esta doctrina: "La Verdadera Descripción de Cristo" y "La Verdad Acerca de La Esclavitud", ambos producidos por el ministerio Israel United In Christ (IUIC), whose origin is American.

And this is the doctrine:  ^[1]Jesus the Black Christ and
The Pure Breed
[LINK, Isarel United in Christ]

1. Jesus is black, not white.
2. Black people are a superior race.
3. The white man, as the executioner he has been, is of the devil, and will be destroyed by God.

Algunos de los tentáculos de esta doctrina han llegado a casa, con algunos matices propios, que también examinaremos. Matices como que "La raza blanca es una raza inferrior, física e intelectualmente" hablando, entre otros.

Para ya por el año 2003 cuando yo todavía vivía en el Condado del Bronx (Nueva York), estaba "surgiendo" un movimiento que predicaba a Jesús el Cristo Negro y que el hombre blanco venía del diablo y que iba ser destruído por Dios. Y aunque yo no andaba en los caminos del señor para ese entonces, ahora entiendo que el señor me estaba preparando justamente para este momento. Yo presenciaba batallas entre este grupo Israel United in Christ (IUIC) and people who stopped at Fordham Plaza a debatir con ellos, cuyo fundador es el "Obisbpo Nathanael".

For more than a decade I saw IUIC members in that or other places in New York, but I didn't really understand the issue, and I simply thought they were crazy. And although I did not walk in the ways of the Lord, it is very obvious that I myself was contaminated, but with the doctrine of the false white Christ, which today we know was the creation of the Catholic Church. No, Jesus is also not that handsome white, green- or blue-eyed Christ with long hair that the Christian world has embraced as its god. Yes, their god—because that is not God.

And for those who have embraced that famous image of Jesus Christ that we see in books, movies, statues, paintings, etc., let's see what the Bible says about it:

⁴ You shall not make for yourself an image or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. 

⁵ No te inclinarás a ellas, ni las honrarás; porque yo soy Jehová tu Dios, fuerte, celoso, que visito la maldad de los padres sobre los hijos hasta la tercera y cuarta generación de los que me aborrecen, 

⁶ and I show mercy to thousands, to those who love me and they keep my commandments. —EXODUS 20:4-6

¹⁴ nature itself Does it not teach you that it is DISHONORABLE for a man to let his hair grow? 

¹⁵ On the contrary, it is honorable for a woman to let her hair grow; because instead of a veil, hair is given to her. 1 CORINTHIANS 11:14-15

As far as I understand, Jesus is in heaven, and the text is very clear: you will not make an image of what is up there. And it is dishonorable for a man to let his hair grow long and Jesus is a man, right? The only exception in the scriptures are the Nazarites, who made a vow with God and as a sign they let their hair grow, among other things:

⁵ All the time of the vow of his Nazirite no razor will come upon his head; Until the days of his separation from Jehovah are fulfilled, he will be holy; he will let his hair grow. —NUMBERS 6:5

It was not for fashion or style that the Nazarites let their hair grow; Sanzón was a Nazirite.

Antes de avanzar, primero veamos qué dice la Biblia sobre la naturaleza de Cristo, y que nos dice sobre lo que debemos considerar, y—más importante aún, lo que debemos rechazar. Es decir, si aún Jesús fuese ese "hombre" elegante y actractivo de pelo largo que nos pintan en las películas, y lo aceptamos, estamos desobedeciendo a Dios al crearnos esa imagen. Y hablando de atractivo, dice la palabra de Dios:

 ² He will come up like a branch before him, and like a root out of dry ground; there is no appearance in it, nor beauty; we will see him, but without attractiveness so that we wish him. —ISAIAH 53:2

That is what the word of God says about that white Christ that Christians have adopted, courtesy of his mother Rome. Now the movement Israel United in Christ He preaches a black Jesus Christ, and we have been given an image to behold. The interesting thing is that this black Christ of IUIC tiene las características no solo de un hombre negro, sino de un negro afroamericano. Es decir, un negro estadounidense con todos los atractivos que cualquier hombre pudiera tener. Hay mujeres que se vuelven locas al ver un hombre como ese. Claro, quizás como mujer usted dirá "a mí no me gusta ese hombre", pero ese es el gusto suyo, y "para el gusto"—dice un dicho popular, "los colores". And Christ, the Bible says, had no attractiveness for any woman on earth to desire him, or even for a man to admire or envy his physical characteristics.

Pero la Biblia dice "no te harás imagen…", y este hombre negro es una imagen. Y aunqe es una imagen esto no quiere decir que Israel United in Christ no tenga una explicación "BíBLICA" para justificar esta imagen. Ah, el poder de las imagenes, por algo Dios dijo "no lo hagas". ^[2]Are Images Wrong?
[LINK, IUIC] 

 

Oh Raquel, when do you plan to leave your idols!

In that same study of how to make images, IUIC presents us with a graph where the Bishop Nathanael y los demás líderes de esa secta son presentados con trajes "galácticos", con escudos en sus pectorales que representan cada una de las 12 tribus de Israel. Y detrás de ellos vemos una invasión OVNI; es decir, una invasión extratrerrestre. Bueno, Wernher von Braun former director and father of NASA confessed before dying that "La Última Carta" of the elite that governs this world would be an extraterrestrial invasion, and that "todo eso es una mentira".

So whether it's an abysmal blur or pushing a perverse agenda, Israel United in Christ It is a very dangerous sect and must be rejected.

The Anti-Defamation League, ADL by its acronym in English, denounces the movement Israel United in Christ, and points them out as an extremist and very dangerous sect. that carries a message of hate. They point to them and other similar groups, whose origins, they say, date back to the late 1700s and early 1800s, where they identify Gabriel Prosser, "un ex esclavo," como el primero en predicar sobre el Cristo negro y la supremacía de la raza negra. Entiendo que La Liga Antidefamación es una institución judía y por tanto ellos darán su punto de vista, pero también nos dan un marco histórico del asunto que también debemos considerar. ^[3]Extremist Sects Within the Black Hebrew Israelite Movement
[LINK: ADL]

As I mentioned in the video of my presentation on this topic, about two years ago I came across this group of IUIC here in the city of Philadelphia. Well, actually I have seen them on the streets for more time, but it was on that occasion that I decided to stop my vehicle one day and took a steering wheel that they gave me. This was two pamphlets in one: The True Description of Christ and The Truth About Slavery, according to them, of course.

For more than two years that flyer was rolling back and forth in my apartment, but I had never taken the time to read and analyze it until this moment. Just a few weeks ago I had thrown it in the trash, only to take it out later, because something told me I was going to need it. Now I have no doubt that that something was God, who was impressing my heart, preparing me for this right moment.

It is no secret to the members of our WhatsApp group that my brother Miguel and I have clashed head-on on this matter; him defending the Black Christ and the position that the white race is an inferior race, physically and intellectually speaking, while I defend what I understand is the biblical Christ, not the Catholic one. There has been a lot of friction between the two and tempers have escalated. Fortunately—and responsibly, we have both decided to take this topic and any other with height, understanding that it is God we want to exalt, not man.

La posición que Miguel presenta es que "el negro es un ser humano bien hecho" y que "el color de piel del negro es el que más se asemeja al color de Dios." Por mi parte, yo comparto la idea de que el negro es un ser humano bien hecho, pues a ese lo creó Dios. Pero también afirmo que el blanco es un ser humano bien hecho, así como también el Chino, el Mexicano, el Francés, el Griego, el Panameño, etc., pues—hasta que se demuestre lo contrario, a ellos también los creó Dios:

²⁶ Then God said: Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness; and have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, over the cattle, over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth. 

²⁷ And God created man in his image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them. 

²⁸ And God blessed them, and he said to them: Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth, and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over all the living things that move on the earth. —GENESIS 1:26-28

So, if the white man—to be more specific, was made in the image and likeness of God, how is it possible that he is of an inferior race? Is God perhaps an inferior God?

Another one-

²⁶ And from one blood he has made the entire lineage of men, so that they may dwell on the entire face of the earth; and has predetermined for them the order of times, and the limits of their habitation;

²⁷ so that they may seek God, if in some way, by feeling, they can find him, although he is certainly not far from each one of us. 

²⁸ For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as some of your own poets have also said: For we are his offspring. —ACTS 17:26-28

 And if we are of his lineage, how is it possible that the white man is an inferior race? That's the thing, Miguel, when you declare something as radical as that, you open too many doors, through which practically everything can enter—and everything. Let's take your position for a moment, that the black man is physically and intellectually superior to the white man, AND that this makes the white man an inferior race. Now let's take the following example:

Suppose a mother has a child who is born with the Down's Syndrome; A syndrome that we all know presents a mental retardation where the brain of this human being does not develop normally.

Now let's ask the question, Are people with Down syndrome an inferior race? And let's not forget that both whites and blacks are affected by this condition.

And what about a person in full capacity of his mental faculties, but who is quadriplegic... is this person of an inferior race?

Yes, I know that a quadriplegic person does not have any physical strength to lift even a spoon in many cases, but that does not make them an inferior race. And the child born with Down Syndrome may not be able to multiply the table from 1 to 9; But does this make him an inferior race?

Hoy día sabemos que muchas enfermedades, como el Síndomre de Down y la Parálisis Ceberal, son causadas por vacunas y otros contaminantes, pero tú mencionastes la fuerza física y la capacidad intelectual como características que representan la superioridad o inferioridad de una raza. Tú tienes conocimientos muy avanzados en muchas áreas, y comprendes cosas que la mayoría allá afuera no puede comprender, por una razón u otra. Dime, ¿eres tú superior a ellos por tú "ventaja" intelectual o porque simplemente has estudiado más que ellos?

I also know, Miguel, that you spoke only of physical and mental abilities, but on several occasions you also said that the white man is simply an inferior race. And if the black is well made, how is the white made? Who made the white man? Does God do bad things?

Pero tú dirás, "bueno esas son personas enfermas", y eso no aplica. Está bien, tomemos a un hombre blanco sano, de unas 125 libras de peso y una estatura de 5 pies y 2 pulgadas. Ahora tomemos a un hombre negro sano, de unos 6 pies y 4 pulgadas de estatura y 240 libras de peso. Aquí vemos diferencias físicas muy marcadas. Entonces consideremos las siguientes palabras de Jesús:

³⁶ You will not swear by your head, because you can't make a single hair white or black. —MATHEW 5:36

And if a human being cannot make a single hair on his head white or black, can it add or take away from his stature? We understand that today there are artificial methods to dye hair, but that is not changing the color of the hair because as soon as the hair grows, the original color begins to shine from its roots.

So it comes to mind, was Goliath of a superior race to David? Are giants a superior race in writing because they have a physical advantage over other people? Does God call them that?

El punto que estoy tratando de presentar es que todos nacemos con diferencias físicas "superiorres" e "inferiores" a otros, y todo esto viene codificado en nuestro ADN. Es decir, si naciste de 5′ 2″ y no de 6′ 4″ es porque así te diseñó Dios, y—por tanto, eso no te hace superior o inferior a otros; te hace diferente. Y yo pregunto, Was Zacchaeus an inferior man to the Rich Young Man of Matthew 19 because of his diminutive size? This classification of superiority or inferiority of one race over or under the other is nothing more than another variant of racism.

That ministry of Israel United in Christ It says that each of the 12 tribes of Israel come from black and Latin races and some aboriginal races. In your study on the Giants last Saturday, February 17, 2024, you stated—Miguel, that "Las 12 tribus de Israel fueron negras." Eso podría ser o no verdad, pero la escritura no te respalda en esa declaración. Esta es prácticamente la misma doctrina de Israel One in Christ. And not only that, but that collapses on its own, because this is what the word of God says about Israel:

⁶ For you are a holy people to Jehovah your God; The Lord your God has chosen you to be a special people to him, more than all the peoples that are on the earth. 

⁷ It is not because you are more than all people that Jehovah loved you and chose you, for you were the most insignificant of all peoples; 

⁸ but because the LORD loved you, and was willing to keep the oath that he swore to your fathers, the LORD has brought you out with a mighty hand, and has rescued you from bondage, out of the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt. —DEUTERONOMY 7:6-8

Well, if we are going to talk about an inferior race, here we see God himself saying that Israel was the most "inferior" of all the peoples of the earth. And the reference here is that Israel did not have the size or the physical or weapons forces of its enemies and the other peoples of the earth. So, ¿y no que los negros—"las 12 Tribus" de Israel en este caso, fueron creados con superioridad sobre las demás razas, que también incluye a los blancos? Well, God says just the opposite. However, God can say that about human beings since we are all inferior to God, but God never calls anyone inferior because of their physical build, much less because of their skin color or intellectual capacity. That is not our place to say and it is, in my opinion, a serious distortion of the word of God.

God judges man by his character, not by his skin color. God, however, does not treat the wicked the same as the Holy One, since he has a law under which his people govern. And if his people are obedient to this law, everyone would receive blessings, and therefore there is no respecter of persons. God did not treat Lot the same as the other inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah, because Lot was faithful, while they were not. Or could it be that Lot was privileged by God because of his skin color? What was Job's skin color? Let's see-

²⁸ I walk blackened, and not by the sun; I have stood up in the congregation, and cried out.

²⁹ I have become a brother to jackals, and a companion to ostriches.

³⁰ My skin has turned black and falls off, And my bones burn with heat.

³¹ My harp has been changed into mourning, And my flute into the voice of mourners. —JOB 30:30

We all know Job's misfortune, and how the devil attacked him and took almost everything from him. Here Job himself declares that he, at the very least, was a white man—or perhaps Latin?—whose skin was blackened by the scabies that Satan brought upon him. (Job 2:7). And my question is, Was Job a righteous man or a man of an inferior race?

And Jeremiah wrote—

¹⁰ Our skin turned black like an oven because of the burning of hunger. —LAMENTATIONS 5:10

And if something turns black it is because it is not black by nature, or am I wrong? Furthermore, Jeremiah descends from the priestly tribe of Levi. And according Israel United In Christ, Today's Haitians are those Levites of yesterday. Does the Haitian become black or is the Haitian a black man? And it should be noted that many years ago I worked with a white-skinned Haitian colleague. There aren't that many, but there are. Anyway, no, the Levites of yesterday are not the Haitians of today.

Probably even more than black, The Chinese have been the most oppressed human being throughout history. And who oppressed the Chinese man, the white man? No, Chinese himself oppressed him!

And that is the point, that man when he sees himself in a position of power usually abuses it, and that is not determined by the color of your skin, but by the color of your heart!

[EDITION, May 13, 2024]

Israel Unido en Cristo, en su estudio "La verdad sobre la esclavitud", citó la Biblia como evidencia de que el hombre blanco esclavizó al negro:

Dueteronomio 28:15 "Pero acontecera, if you do not listen to the voice of Jehovah your God, to try to fulfill all his commandments and his statutes that I command you today, that all these curses will come upon you, and will overtake you."

Deuteronomy 28:48: "Serviras, por tanto, a tus enemigos que enviare Jehova contra ti, with hunger and thirst and nakedness, and lack of all things; and he will put a yoke of iron on your neck until he destroys you."

Es verdaderamenrte increible la desconección de esta gente, ¿o será que simplemente están llevando una agenda bien planeada? Ellos culpan al hombre blanco de la esclavitud del hombre "negro" (Israel) cuando los textos que ellos mismos presentan muestran que Israel fue entregado en esclavitud en varias ocasiones por causa de su rebeldía contra Dios, y que fue Dios mismo quien los entregó. Ahora bien, estos textos, ni ningún otro texto en las escrituras tan siquiera insinúan que las personas eran esclavizadas por su color de piel, y que solo los negros eran esclavizados. El que tenga un texto que demuestre lo contrario que nos lo deje saber, por favor, y por aquí mismo lo publicaremos.

And since the point was also made here that "Las 12 Tribus de Israel fueron negras", and that in turn "los egipcios de ese tiempo eran negros", I wonder, Who was it that enslaved Israel for 430 years?

Entiendo que esa pregunta merece una respuesta, pues aquí vemos a "los negros"—los egipcios, esclavizando a "los negros"—Las 12 Tribus de Israel. ¿Y no que el hombre blanco es el opresor y el negro la victima?

Otra cosa, Israel Unido en Cristo predica que Israel fue esparcido por el mundo por tribus. De ahí es que yo forzan la idea de su clasificación de "Las 12 Tribus de Israel hoy".

1. Judah — Blacks
2. Benjamin —West Indies
3. Levi — THE HAITIANS
4. Efraín — Puerto Ricans
5. Manasé — Cubans
6. Simeon — Dominicans
7. Rubén — Seminole Indians
8. Gad — North American Indians
9. Naftalí—Argentina and Chile
10. Zebulon — Guatemala to Panama
11. Asher — Colombia to Uruguay
12. lsacar — Mexican Indians

Nowhere does the Bible say that Israel, when scattered throughout the world, was separated by Tribes. In fact, when Israel entered Egypt we see that the entire 12 tribes were enslaved in one place (EXD. 1). 

[END OF EDITION]

"En el negro está el color de la piel de Dios."

That is irreconcilable with writing. To begin with, although it is said of Jesus that "sus brazos y sus pies [were] like color burnished bronze," (DAN. 10:6), That is not said about the Father in the Bible; nor of the Holy Spirit. And the divinity of God is made up of three. Or is it not so?

Y aquí caemos nuevamente en el asunto de la imagen y semejanza. Imagen y semejanza no es lo mismo que una réplica. Miguel, en el estudio de Los Gigantes reconociste que Adán y Set eran "parecidos" a Cristo, y Cristo parecido al Padre. Y parecido no es lo mismo que igual. Sin embargo, anteriormente tú afirmaste:

"Ser imagen y semejanza de algo o de alguién es ser físicamente y moralmente lo mismo que ese alguién es."

Aside from the fact that this is not written anywhere in the word of God, the question I ask you is, Did God sin?

While it is true that Adam was created with the physical image and likeness of God's character, Adam did not have the same character as God, for Adam sinned, and God cannot sin. Can you understand this?

And we know that man was made in the image and likeness of Christ, but we do not know about Christ. That is, was Christ made in the image and likeness of the Father? Was Christ created? What did Jesus tell Philip about his relationship with the Father?

⁸ Philip said to him: Lord, show us the Father, and it is enough for us. 

⁹ Jesus said to him: Have I been with you so long, and you have not known me, Philip? He who has seen me has seen the Father; How then do you say: Show us the Father? 

¹⁰ Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father in me? The words that I speak to you, I do not speak on my own authority, but the Father who dwells in me, he does the works. — JOHN 14:8-10

Was Jesus talking about physical equality and skin color or was Jesus talking about the work and mission of the Father and the son?

And continuing with the matter of image and likeness, What color skin is he then is the Holy Spirit? I'm just asking the question, and I'm not going to navigate those waters because that is very dangerous terrain. (MAT. 12:31)

David, presents the writing, was blonde. And Jesus is the root of David's lineage (APC. 22:16). I had presented the point that Jesus had indeed chosen an inferior race for his holy lineage. And I received in response:

"Rubio, no se refiere a color de piel, sino del cabello".

My brother Zabdiel made the same comment to me the other day in one of our Zoom studios, the question I ask you, brother, is how many black people with blonde hair do you know in your life? How many do you know in your family?

Si bien es cierto que el color rubio, generalmente hablando, se refiere a un color del cabello y no de piel, también es cierto que son los blancos que generalmente tienen el pelo rubio, no los negros. No, no todo blanco tiene el pelo rubio, pero sí todo rubio es de piel blanca, con una salva "excepción": the inhabitants of the Solomon Islands,, cuyos habitantesùno toodos, son "negros", pero que tienen el pelo rubio.

They are a race of natives called the Melanesians. And not all Melanesians have this characteristic, but it is estimated that between 5 and 10% of them have it. We are told of colonization by the Germans and the British as a possible cause. Furthermore, scientists tell us about the gene mutation TYRP1; ^[4]Black Blondes: Mlanesians from the Solomon Islands
[LINK: The Citizen]

This case is very interesting, but if you put a critical eye on the photos presented you will begin to see a repeating pattern: These blacks are not so black, They have very European—or white man—physical features. And I'm not talking about his blonde hair, but about the physical structure of his face, his nose, mouth, cheekbones, etc. These blacks don't look like Africans! "Aquí hay maco encerrao" either "eso está chivo" They say in my country, the Dominican Republic.

And the fact that only a low percentage of the Milanese population has blonde hair suggests that more than a race, we see a mix here. And even their black skin color is not as dark as that of Africans.

Despite having blonde hair, we do not see any of them with green or blue eyes in any of the photos, something very typical in white people with blonde hair. Let me speculate a little here, since this must continue to be studied: it seems to me that there is a mixture of the white man with the black man here, or—more likely, there is a genetic manipulation here, like the many that have been carried out carried out all over the world for quite some time now.

And I say genetic manipulation because this would explain the apparent absence or shortage of green and blue eyes that we see in this population. When scientists talk about mutation, this usually refers to genetic manipulation.

Al parecer estos negros no son tan "puros" como "los africanos más puros, los que no se han mezclado." Y a ellos se le han utilizado como ejemplo para tratar de minizar la rubiez de David y la pareja de enamorados que presenta el libro de cantares.

Y no se vaya usted a engañar, pues aunque estas personas habitan en las llamadas "Islas Salomón", ellos están ubicados geográficamente en el territorio cerca de Papua New Guinea and of Oceania; that is, in the area of Australia. They have nothing to do with Israel, perceptually speaking. Searching on the Google map we see that from Israel to the Solomon Islands it is about 8,651 miles away. That's a pretty wide distance.

Esto quiere decir, que esto del negro "puro" con pelo rubio de forma natural es una posibilidad muy distante, si es que la hay, en el mejor de los casos. Todo apunta a una mezcla o alteración genénica, y—en el mejor de los casos, esta es una excepción, no una regla. Y por aquí en CristoVerdad siempre hemos presentado que una excepción no hace la regla, aunque sabemos que las excepciones existen. El punto es que no podemos afirmar lo que no podemos comprobar.

"Los Comentarios de Elena White sobre los negros son crueles, son criminales."

Miguel se refiera a esa famosa cita de la profetiza Adventista, que dice que "en el cielo no habrá línea de color porque todos seremos blancos como el señor jesús" y otras citas como que "los negros no deben buscar igualdad de condiciones" o que "los blancos no deben casarse con personas de raza negra".

Below I leave the topic about Ellen White, where we cover her cruelty and racism, because that is what it is. Watch the third video: RACIST.

Cruel and criminal, correct—Miguel. But with all due respect, brotherAnd aren't your comments about white people cruel or criminal? Do you believe that calling a person inferior because of their simple physical appearance and skin color or a so-called intellectual inferiority is an act of love? I dare you to go and tell a white person what you think about his race, to see how he reacts, if you are going to see it as an act of love on your part.

From what I see you presenting is that virtually all biblical characters are black—at least those who served God, and that is not in the Bible, which includes the sanctuary and creation. IUIC presents that same teaching, and that is what you are preaching.

One story that I did not have time to cover during my Zoom presentation was Moses' affair with the Cushite woman.

Esta cita bíblica merecería su propio estudio en sí, pero por el momento, enfoquemonos en lo que allí sucedió. Moisés toma a Séfora por mujer, quien era una mujer de la región del Cus. Y Aaron y su hermana María murmuraron contra su hermano Moisés, "por causa de esta mujer cusita…". ¿Y qué tenía esta mujer que ellos murmuraron contra Moisés? 

Some versions of the Bible present Zipporah as an Ethiopian woman. And Ethiopians, generally speaking, are black people. Well, to begin with, the scripture does not directly mention the Cushites as one of those people that God commanded Israel not to mix, because of idolatry and perversion, much less because of skin color.

And Cush or Kush was the eldest son of Ham, brother of Misraim (Egypt) and Canaan (GEN. 10:6). And Ham was the same son of Noah who saw his nakedness. Cush was the father of Nimrod. (Gen. 10:8). So here we see a generation of people separated from God, and it could be suggested that this was the cause of the murmuring. However, the scripture does not affirm this.

The entire territory known today as Africa is the land of Cush. And Africans, for the most part, are black. Although we cannot know exactly, it is very likely that Zipporah was black and that this was the reason why Aaron and Miriam murmured against Moses, since the text specifically mentions that it was because of their Cushite race that was the cause of the murmuring. The young woman in love with the book of songs presents us with a glimpse of what was happening in Israel at that time:

⁵ I am dark, oh daughters of Jerusalem, but covetable Like the tents of Cedar, Like Solomon's curtains.
⁶ Don't notice that I'm dark, Because the sun looked at me. My mother's sons were angry with me; They put me to guard the vineyards; And my vineyard, which was mine, I did not keep. —SONGS 1:5-6

The text suggests that Israel not only had a problem of idolatry but also racism. And this could very well explain that both Mary and Aaron were affected by this scourge of Satan.

However, what it seems is that Moses was not very involved with this issue of racism, nor was God much less, to say from the admonition they received from God, mainly Mary (or Miriam), who seems to have been the instigator of this murmuring, since his name is mentioned first (EX. 12:1). And if they murmured against Moses for having taken a black woman, I ask, what color skin was Moses? And Moses, note this fact, was a Levite.

No olvidemos que eran los judíos los que andaban en eso de discriminación de personas por causa de su raza. El tal es el caso de su relación con los samaritanos y el resto de los gentiles. Al parecer no entendieron lo "insginificante" que ellos una vez fueron.

But God has this to say:

Are we calling the man for whom Christ died inferior?

Yes, Jesus died for the white man, just as he died for the black man, the Chinese man, and the Japanese man.

"El negro es más fértil."

I really don't know where you get this information from. When you and I immigrated to the United States in 1994, for example, black people were by far the largest minority in the United States, with whites being the largest demographic. Today, almost 30 years later, whites are still the majority and Hispanics are now the largest minority, and it is estimated that in a couple of decades—if Christ has not come yet, they will be the majority—they have not been exterminated. with vaccines, of course. And while it is true that a good amount of the Latino population in the United States is black, the vast majority is a mixture of different races, which we can observe by the great variety of colors in this population.

And a mixture is not "una raza más pura", según lo que tú mismo has enseñado. Así que los negros hispanos no pueden ser contados como negros—según tu propia descricpión, pues "más puros" no son. Y aunque la población afroamericana sigue en crecimiento en Estados Unidos, son los latinos el grupo "más fértil", to say due to their great demographic growth, that in a short time in this country they have surpassed the black population in number. And it has not only been the migration of Latinos to the United States that has contributed to its population growth, but also due to its great fertility, reproducing on American soil.

Blacks are the majority in Africa, just as the Chinese are the majority in China, but from there to declare that the black is more fertile is an exaggeration, given that the majority of people in the world—to this day, are not black. . And let's see, the Chinese should be called the most fertile in the world, since there is no race more numerous than them, closely followed by the Hindus. Furthermore, even if it were true that the black is more fertile, where do we get that for that reason this gives us the right to call those who are not black an inferior race, from where?

I hope for a single biblical text that only hints that white people are an inferior race. Those are personal conjectures, which biblical scripture does not support. And since we have covered the topic a little, where do we find that teaching in the sanctuary or in creation, where?

Returning to the book of Songs, let us consider the following:

¹⁰ My beloved is white and blonde, Designated among ten thousand.
¹¹ His head like the finest gold; Her hair curly, black like the crow —SONGS 5:10-11

Miguel pointed out in his study of Los Gigantes that there is a contradiction here. And since there is a contradiction, then we reject the text completely. My comment would be, yes there is a contradiction, Why does the balance always have to fall on the side that defends your position—black race as a superior race? ¿Por qué esa tal llamada contradicción no sería en donde el texto dice que el cabello era negro? ¿Por qué rechazar lo rubio automaticamente? En inglés a eso se le llama "bias" o favoritismo.

One thing I have known in my study of the scriptures over time is that in the Bible, while it is true that man has introduced contradictions (DAN. 7:25, JER. 8:8), Not everything is a contradiction, even if something seems like a contradiction. Before stating something as a contradiction, We must first seek harmony and see if it can be reconciled with the rest of the scriptures. (JOHN 5:39). There are things that sometimes are not obvious and you have to dig a little deeper. That is why it is so important that we understand the teaching in the book of Isaiah:

⁹ Who will be taught science, or who will be made to understand doctrine? To the weaned? To those torn from the breasts? 

¹⁰ Because commandment after commandment, command upon command, line after line, line upon line, a little there, a little there;

¹¹ for in the tongue of stutterers, and in a strange tongue he will speak to this people, 

¹² To whom he said, This is the rest; give rest to the weary; and this is the refreshment; but they did not want to hear. 

¹³ Therefore the word of the Lord will be to them commandment after commandment, command upon command, line upon line, line upon line, a little there, a little there; until they go and fall on their backs, and are broken, bound, and taken. —ISAIAH 28:9-13

Once again, if in the same text or in any other place in the scriptures we see an apparent contradiction, we must analyze line by line, a little here and a little there, until the truth comes to light. For a long time we did that in ChristTruth, and God was always glorified in us. But nevertheless I see that we are losing that direction.

And what did I find when I reanalyzed the text?

Well, to start, during my Zoom study I was going to cover that apparent contradiction in Song of Solomon 5:10, but with the rush of time it escaped me, and here I present it to you. Let's look at the text in some versions and translations so we can compare:

Ok, lo que aquí podemos observar es que cuando el texto dice mi amado es blanco y rubio no se está refiriendo al pelo, sino al color de Piel. El color "sonrosado" se refiere a un tono de piel rojizo, que podemos encontrar en tanto personas blancas como en negras. Sin embargo, el texto enfatiza "mi amdo es blanco", y luego entonces "sonrosado" o "rubio", lo que nos indica un blanco rojizo y no un negro rojizo. Las Biblias en inglés dicen Ruddy, which means the same thing, a reddish color. So, this apparent contradiction is simply nothing more than a lack of research, according to what I have found here.

Someone once pointed out to you, Michael, the text of Colossians 2:14, where it seems to suggest that the law of God was abolished. Tell me, if you saw a contradiction, why didn't you reject the text then? Did you not go and search until God showed you to look in older versions where the text was clearer?

What happens, I understand, is that you have put aside the method given by God (ISA. 28:13), to be able to carry out your own conjectures. And this is not a perception, it is what I am clearly seeing.

Recuerdo que en algún momento compartiste un audio donde dijiste que el negro es tan superior al hombre blanco, que "eso de hacer pozo sépticos el blanco no tiene la capacidad para eso." Estoy parrafreando, ¿pero de dónde sacas tú que el hombre blanco no tiene capaciad para construir un pozo séptico? ¿Qué dice el hombre blanco al respecto?

Another one…

Since quite a bit was covered in my video, I'm going to close with this. In your last video Miguel, at some point you said "nadie tiene la piel color dorado", and that is correct. And I'm going to take it further, no one on this earth has skin the color of burnished bronze. That tone does not exist in our skin. That is why both Daniel (10:6) and John (Revelation 1:15) speak of feet and arms similar—not equal to burnished bronze.

And similar, I repeat, is not the same as equal. No one has that skin color on earth, since both Daniel and John saw Jesus in his glory in heaven. As I mentioned before, they saw things that none of the disciples who walked with Jesus saw. And John, by the way, was one of those disciples and he himself did not recognize Christ in his vision:

¹² And I turned to see the voice that spoke to me; and when I returned, I saw seven golden lampstands, 

¹³ and in the middle of the seven candlesticks, to one like the Son of Man, dressed in clothing that reached to the feet, and girded around the chest with a gold sash. 

¹⁴ His head and hair were white like white wool, like snow; his eyes like a flame of fire; 

¹⁵ and his feet were like polished bronze, shining as in a furnace; and his voice is like the sound of many waters. —REVELATION 1:12-15

Juan vio a uno semejante al hijo del hombre, ni siquiera dice al hijo del hombre. Lo que Juan vio en su visión en la isla de Patmos no fue a Jesús el Cristo que caminó en la tierra, sino a "uno como semejante al hijo del hombre". Y Juan fue el discípulo que caminó más cerca con Jesús.

⁶ His body was like beryl, and his face was like lightning, and his eyes were like torches of fire, and his arms and his feet like a burnished bronze color, and the sound of his words like the roar of a crowd. —DANIEL 10:6

Y Daniel, por su parte, también dice que vio a uno semejante al hijo del hombre. Es decir, que Daniel tampoco vio al hijo del hombre, en sí, sino la Gloria de Cristo. "His body was like beryl", lo que indica que "el color de Jesús" es verde, pues el berilo es una piedra preciosa cuyo color es un verde azulado y esmeralda, parecido a colores que encontramos en algunas playas del Caribe.

It should be noted that there are color variations in beryl, such as red, gold, etc., but this greenish color is the most abundant in nature. So, did the disciples see a green Jesus? If you think so, then they also saw it in burnished bronze color. But if not, then you must reject the idea that Jesus is black simply because he is compared to polished bronze.

Daniel and John saw a Jesus with arms and feet resembling burnished bronze in color, while his body was green like beryl. But more importantly, what they saw was pure glory, and that explains the burnished bronze color and a beryl-colored body, because that was nothing they had ever seen in a man's body.

[EDITION, May 12, 2024]

And that glory that John and Daniel saw was full of symbols; and that is what those colors of metals and precious stones represent: symbols. Symbols that, until further notice, have not been revealed, or at least we do not understand. And if we don't understand them, we must continue studying.

El problema principal aquí es que se ha tomado parte de un texto bíblico—"bronce bruñido", aislandolo del resto del texto—"cabeza blanca, cuerpo semante al berilo", y se ha perdido el contexto real del texto completo: la gloria de Cristo. Se está violando por completo el principio de Isaías 28:13 y Juan 5:39. Y mientras este principio se viole es imposible entender la palabra de Dios correctamente.

[END EDIT]

So taking the burnished bronze color and declaring that this is why Jesus was a black man does not do justice to biblical scripture, because although it may seem to imply it, the scripture does not declare it. And if the scripture does not declare it, it is because it has not been revealed. And if it has not been revealed, you and I must be silent in this matter (DEUT. 29:29).

And I understand the issue of dreams that there are people who have dreamed of a black Jesus Christ. However, this is no guarantee of anything either, for the Lord manifests himself in many ways—as in the form of a whirlwind before Job, or a burning bush before Moses, and it is not until he comes in his second coming that the scripture declares:

³² Beloved, we are now children of God, and it has not yet been revealed it that we must be; but we know that when he appears, we will be like him, because we will see him as he is. —JOHN 1:32

We will see him, that is, we have not seen him as he is. And that is what John says, one who saw it in the flesh. That is, John knows that the Jesus who walked the earth is not the glorified Jesus who is coming. And neither John nor any of the disciples who walked with him ever mentioned his skin color, good or bad.

It is my understanding that there is something here that has not been revealed, but that we will know very soon, since his second coming is very close. And until further notice, to say that Jesus was—or is white or black or any other color, is to add to the scriptures, and is—I understand, a path of quicksand for anyone who decides to walk through it.

[EDITION, May 12, 2024]

It has been declared that "Jesús tuvo el mismo cuerpo físico en la tierra que el que él tiene en el cielo." Well, the scriptures don't say that. In fact, the scriptures say no:

⁴ because the blood of bulls and goats cannot take away sins.
⁵ Therefore, entering into the world, he says: Sacrifice and offering you did not want; Further you prepared my body. —HEBREWS 0:4-5

If a body was prepared for Jesus to live on earth, it is because this body is different from that in heaven. And no, we are not just talking about Jesus being given a child's body to be born of a virgin, but a body in a totally different nature than the one he had in heaven. Let us remember the description that John and Daniel gave of Jesus in heaven, and then imagine for a moment that Jesus—having the same physical body of heaven on earth, What would have been the reaction of everyone who saw it on earth? Do you think that an author as meticulous as Luke would have ignored those details?  

Do you remember the story of Moses' shining face?

²⁹ When Moses was coming down from Mount Sinai with the two tablets of testimony in his hand, when he came down from the mountain, Moses did not know that the skin of his face glowed for having spoken with God. 

³⁰ When Aaron and all the Israelites saw that the skin of Moses' face was shining, they were afraid to approach him.

³¹ Then Moses called them, and Aaron and all the leaders of the congregation returned to him, and Moses spoke to them.

³³ When Moses finished speaking with them, he put a veil over his face. —EXODUS 34:29-31, 33

And the question I ask myself is, How many people on earth would have approached Jesus if he had: a) a head white as wool, b) feet and arms like burnished bronze, and c) the rest of his body green as beryl?

If you claim that Jesus had feet and hands—or his entire body—like burnished bronze, then you also have to add the other characteristics that Daniel and John present, since these come from the same biblical texts that speak of burnished bronze. No, the Bible does not declare that Jesus was a black man any more than it declares that he was a white man. And since the Bible does not declare it, I am silent on that matter.

[END OF EDITION]

We will probably have a Q&A with Miguel next Saturday, February 24, and I have reserved some questions for then. With this and what may happen in that question and answer section, I conclude the topic. I agree with Miguel, we should not be in a continuous back and forth on this topic. The two positions have already been presented, you be the jury. If God reveals something different along the way, then we will make the necessary adjustments.

[EDITION, May 13, 2024]

That radical position that you have, Miguel, on the nature of Christ and the white race as an inferior race not only awakens passions, but also many questions that must be answered; I close this study with some of them:

If the black man, since his creation, is physically or intellectually superior to the white man, I need you or someone to explain to me, How is it possible that the white man, being a physically and intellectually inferior race, enslaved the black man?? ¿Cómo es posible que sea el hombre blanco que controle las riquezas de este mundo si su cualidad intelectual es vastamente inferiora la del hombre negro? ¿Cómo es eso que esa raza "más pura" afircana, siendo la "más fértil" de todas, no sea la mayoría en el mundo? ¿y cómo es eso de que Dios creó una raza superior y una raza inferior?

Y con nada de esto yo estoy diciendo que el hombre blanco es superior por poseer ninguna de estas características o cualidades. Simplemente estoy presentando que tú has hecho de esto un asunto racial y al parecer te has olvidado de la parte más importane: el pecado. Sí, ya se que mencionaste que "el pecado cambió todo en esta tierra", pero luego solo te enfocaste en el asunto del color de piel, y eso no está correcto, aparte de que Dios mismo no da ese enfoque en su palabra.

And the question of the questions that I ask myself is:

Si solamente el hombre negro fue hecho a perfecta (pura) imagen y semejanza de Dios, y que "Ser imagen y semejanza de algo o de alguién es ser físicamente y moralmente lo mismo que ese alguién es", and that since the Haitians supposedly represent the priestly Tribe of Levi today, Why is there so much witchcraft in Haiti? Y si bien, Miguel, tú no has categorizado las 12 Tribus de Israel como el ministerio Israel Unido en Cristo ha hecho, tú dijiste que "las 12 Tribus de Israel fueron negras". Entonces reformulo mi pregunta, Why is there so much witchcraft in Africa and in countries with populations of African descent if the black man was made physically and MORALLY equal to God?  Y el asunto de la caída del hombre no puede sostenerse como una respuesta favirecible, pues—y una vez más, el negro fue hecho "molamente igual a Dios" y Dios—como ya está establecido, no peca. Y ya que por estos medios se ha sugerido que DIos puede pecar, veamos lo que dice la Biblia:

¹³ When anyone is tempted, let him not say that he is tempted by God; because God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone; —JAMES 1:13

And if God cannot be tempted by evil, can the idea that God can sin be even hinted at?

If the black man is morally equal to God, then we must assume that no black man in human history has ever sinned, for God—in his most holy morality, has never sinned, has he not? Has the black man sinned?

Another thing, apparently you have classified everyone who is not white as black, and that is a serious error, where you will not find support either in the Bible, much less in science. Only by uniting all those other races that you are classifying as black can you affirm that the black man is the most fertile in the world. But that classification is yours and does not reflect the reality of human genetics. The hair of the Indian man, for example, is very different from that of the African man, because they are different races. One is not better than the other, they are just different.

The Chinese or Japanese man is not white, but he is not black either. The Hindu man is not white, but he is not black either, although his skin tone is closer to black than white. And the culture of the Hindu man is very different from that of the African man; They are different races.

The Arab man is not black, Miguel, he is Arab, just as the native Mayan man is not black, he is Mayan, with very different characteristics from the African man, not only in his skin tone.

Si miras a la naturaleza te vas a dar cuenta que Dios creó una multitud de variedad de "razas" de animales, con una igual multitud variedad de colores. Los mismo pasa con la raza humana, pues tenemos un Dios creador que a su vez—dicho sea de paso, es muy creativo. Nadie va a confundir a un japonés con un anglosajón, pues so razas distintas, porque así los creó Dios, distintos, no superior el uno sobre el otro, ni mucho menos ineferior, el uno debajo del otro.

Honestly—and I say it with all due respect—your position not only doesn't fit with the biblical position, but it doesn't even fit with human reasoning or logic, nor does science. The arguments you have presented are very weak, and I am truly still trying to understand how you have strayed so far from what the word of God teaches. That is my position regarding what you are presenting at this time.

As I noted above, both positions have already been presented, you, dear reader, be the jury.

[END OF EDITION]

Everyone can comment below. Without further ado, I wish a great blessing for you Miguel, and for everyone who is reading this message.

God bless you!

"Salid de ella, pueblo mio…" (REV. 18:4)

Share…

————————————

Join CristoVerdad. Subscribe to our our group WhatsApp Subscribe to Our WhatsApp Group. When you subscribe, don't forget to leave us your name. Obscenities prohibited. Share and be part of the blessing.

————————————

And you will know the truth... —ChristTruth http:/www.cristo Verdad.com Go to front page

NOTE: Numbers in blue brackets [ ] link to Supplementary Material. Photos also expand content: videos, news, links, etc.

SOURCES AND LINKS

[1] Jesus the Black Christ and The Pure Race [LINK, Israel United in Christ]

[2] Are Images Wrong? [LINK, IUIC]

[3] Extremist Sects Within the Black Hebrew Israelite Movement [LINK: ADL]

[L] Sección Legal, "Copyright disclaimer" sobre derechos de autor y uso justo [ENLACE, CristoVerdad]

NOTE: If any of these links do not work or are incorrect, please let us know so we can correct them. Thank you so much!

If you have any comments, please do so by filling out the form below. Your comments will be published. If you want to write to us privately, do so through the information section, and select contact.