What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 1

What They Haven't Told You

PART 1 VACCINE COVID-19 INGREDIENTS

Navigate to Part [1] What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 1
[STUDY, CristoVerdad] [2] What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 2
[STUDY, CristoVerdad] [3] What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 3
[STUDY, CristoVerdad] [4] of 4

Much has been said about the famous Covid-19 vaccine, mucho. Entre verdad, mentira, ciencia, "ficción"—y realidad, hay de todo en la viña de las vacunas. Sin embargo, hay muy poco tocado, o quizás conveniente ignorado, sobre los ingredientes de lo que están compuestas las diferentes vacunas que están aterrizando en los brazos de billones de seres humanos en todo el mundo. Poco, en el sentido de la población en general, pues médica y científicamente hablando la información es vasta, muy vasta. Pero casi nadie sabe, ya que en "ningún" medio de prensa se habla de esto.

The table above lists the ingredients reported en los documentos oficiales de "autorización" de estas vacunas. Y he aquí los enlaces oficiales con la lista de ingredientes para cada vacuna, respectivamente.

También cubriremos otros "ingredientes" que podrían pasar por desapercibidos al no ser incluídos—directamente, en esta lista. Pero antes de analizarlos, debemos presentar una base sobre cual fue la razón que trajo esta vacuna del Covid-19.

1. And so that you have an idea of what we are going to cover in this study, here I give you a small sample, and we will expand later. Take Moderna Inc.'s vaccine for example. One of its ingredients that we find in the ingredient list of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines is hydroxybutyl. Now let's look at the Safety Data Sheet of several chemical laboratories that sell it...

• Its use as a drug or medicine is warned
• Causes skin and eye irritation
• Dangerous if swallowed
• May cause respiratory irritation
• Acute Toxicity
• Could Cause Cancer (Carcinogenic Hazard) ^[a]1Hydroxybutyl, Definition
  [LINK, NCI]

Furthermore, both the National Library of Medicine just like him National Cancer Institute they tell us that hydroxybutyl is:

Substance that it's used in cancer research to cause bladder tumors in laboratory animals. This is done to test new diets, medications, and procedures for use in cancer prevention and treatment. —National Institute of  Cancer, National Library of Medicine ^[h]1Hydroxybutyl, Definition [LINK, NCI]

This is just so you have an idea of the terrain we will be walking on. Now, let's continue creating the basis of our study and analysis.

On page 1 of the Pfizer Fact Sheet they give us the list of ingredients for this vaccine. And on page 2 we find the following:

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has not undergone the same type of review than an FDA approved or cleared product. The FDA can issue a Emergency Use Authorization (USA) when certain criteria are met, including that there are no suitable, approved and available alternatives.

So what we constantly see and hear on TV that these vaccines have been subjected to the highest level of quality control is an open lie, and you should know it, because they are not going to tell you.

Later we will continue with the list of ingredients, but for now we should know a little more about the purpose of these vaccines and the companies that manufacture them. And to put this in context, let's look at what the Moderna Coivd-19 Vaccine Fact Sheet says:

Así que saber lo que usted se pone en su cuerpo es muy importante, y tanto Moderna—y las demás comapñías detrás de cada vacuna—así como la FDA, así lo afirman. Pero es curioso que ellos mismos dicen que no te pongas la vacuna si eres alérgico a alguno de sus ingredientes. El asunto es, mis amigos, que la gente se da cuenta de eso—sí es que se da cuenta, después de haber sido vacunada, pues no se le está diciendo a nadie al momento de vacunarse que o que no contiene la vacuna, ni mucho menos hay una campaña nacional o internacional educando a la gente sobre sus ingredientes para que todos se aseguren que no son alérgicos a ninguno de ellos.

Y sí—como en el caso la vacuna de Moderna, usted tuvo una reacción adversa a la primera dósis, entonces la recomendación—según lo que acabamos de leer, es no ponerse la segunda. Y sí usted no se pone la segunda, Will you be able to participate in social life normally??, ya que se están poniendo restricciones—y libertades a las personas no vacunadas y vacunadas (dos dósis en el caso de Moderna y Pfizer), respectivamente.

Suena contraproducente, pero el segundo punto aquí presentado, independientemente si usted se puso o no la primera dósis, nos dice que "no se ponga la vacuna sí usted ha tenido alguna reacción alérgica grave a cualquier componente de los ingredientes de esta vacuna." Lo que aquí se presenta es que si usted en el pasado ha tendio reacción adversa a uno de estos ingredientes, vía otro producto que lo contenga. Una vez más, a la gente ni siquiera se le ha insinuado educarse en cuanto a esto, and we understand that this language presented here in this document this as a legal protection para los fabricantes de la vacuna, la FDA, y cualquier otro gremio médico y social que las promueva. Sabemos que los fabricantes de toda vacuna tienen inmunidad legal contra sus daños, pero no necesariamente aquellos que la están recomendando, como son los gobiernos, compañías, artistas y atletas, médicos, etc. Y aunque los fabricantes de estas vacunas tienen inmunidad legal, esto comoquiera podría terminar en una corte, ya que existen abogados muy hábiles que saben explotar cualquier brecha en cualquier ley. Así que este lenguaje aquí no está demás.

At CristoVerdad we always recommend the diet of Genesis 1:29 to lead a healthy lifestyle, and not be in the constant need to use some drug, unless you are hit by a car, some home or work accident where you broke a bone, were shot or had a wound with a lot of bleeding, or anything like that. But if you are going to take a medication, at least know what you are putting in your mouth, or as is now very fashionable, on your arm.

[EDITION] January 28, 2022

Another point of protection for the pushers of this product is the now famous vaccination card (or letter). Card that, we will cover later, is temporary. But for now, today we received this photo from the Dominican Republic, where we found the following—

The paragraph that continues cannot be read in full, as it is covered by the green circle, and for the moment we decided to omit it. And the last paragraph simply asks if you consent to your personal data being shared with the vaccine manufacturers and third parties involved.

Well, we could write an entire study on this vaccination card and we still wouldn't have enough time or space for everything that this concerns, with its repercussions. I'll be as brief as possible, let's touch on some of the parts.

• The first paragraph, continued from the previous page, tells us that you, as a recipient of the vaccine, have asked all necessary questions about safety. and that you have received responses to them when getting vaccinated.

This is a trap, and also a fallacy. They will answer your questions, as long as you don't ask uncomfortable questions or questions that challenge the narrative of the government and pharmaceutical companies.

[VIDEO ON THE GO, Dr. in Peru]

The following paragraphs indicate that you sign and approve them:

• That your doubts have been dispelled. [Once again, this is not true.]
• That the information you have provided is correct.

Be careful with trying to falsify these cards, as they have made it a crime and you could end up in jail, as is already happening. ^[v]f1Couple arrested at Buffalo Bills game for using fake vaccination card
[NEWS, USA Today] ^[v]f2Two Pennsylvania police officers were fired for submitting fake COVID-19 vaccination cards
[NEWS, Insider] ^[v]f3Man arrested in Puerto Rico for presenting false vaccination card
[NEWS,Insider]

These vaccines come with tracking technology, as Dr. Christiane Northrup explains (below), and it is—in the long term, impossible for you to circumvent the vaccine, whether they are targeting you for having it or not having it.

Y en el próximo párrafo de esta tarjeta, lo hacen a usted comprometerse de forma "voluntaria" a recibir la vacuna, and that you—yes—yourself, assume each and every risk associated with the vaccine. OK, PRIMERO: es mentira que la vacuna es voluntaria, pues ya practicamente en todas partes del mundo la han hecho mandatoria. Y mandatoria no es voluntaria, son antónimos, en caso de que usted no sepa mucho de gramática.

SEGUNDO: ¿cómo puede usted asumir los riezgos de algo a lo que a usted lo están presionando, obligando, manipulando, y estorcionando para ponerse en su cuerpo? Sin abundar mucho en esto, aquí les dejo un par de ejemplos. Una joven enfermera de la Universidad UCLA en California, Estados Unidos fue despedida por no tener la vacuna. De la misma manera, en República Domincana una joven trabajadora del gobierno fue despedida por rehusarse a la vacunación.

In the same order, another short edition. Today, February 14, the Ministry of Public Health and the Ministry of Education begin a vaccination campaign in schools in the Dominican Republic, for children ages 5-11. And as always, they tell us that it is voluntary. Let's see what they ask of the students' parents—

"Se inicie este 14 de febrero del 2022, la vacunación a todos los niños en edades de 5 a 11 años. Por lo que solicitamos el consentimiento de ustedes para que se proceda con la inoculación de su hijo, por favor si está de acuerdo firme aquí."

So you have a decision, right? Everything is very nice, but when we read the note at the end of the letter it says the following:

"Nota: El padre que no esté de acuerdo tendrá que presentar una prueba PCR todos los lunes a centro."

That's tremendous. Did you know that—aside from how uncomfortable and painful they are, swab tests are also vaccinating the population?

Y lo último que tenemos es que el Presidente Luis Abinader dijo que todas las restricciones impuestas por consecuencia del Covid-19 are SUSPENDED. 

¿And what fly bit this one?

Well, probably perhaps only Israel in the entire world is the only country more vaccinated than The Dominican Republic. So now it is suddenly the INDIVIDUAL responsibility of each person to take care of their own health? Yes, after practically vaccinating them all with a lethal poison, huh?

Y Abinader dijo "supendidas"—no eliminadas, entienda usted amigo lector la diferencia. Y todo lo que es suspendido puede ser reanudado, a menos que se hable de suspender una vida por medio de un aborto, claro está. But what Abindader did not suspend was the vaccination of children, which began just two days before this statement.

¿Las razones de la suspensión? "Hemos superado lo peor de la pandemia", "hoy los contagios diarios y de las últimas semanas están en franco descenso", "tenemos una de las tazas de mortalidad más bajas del mundo y una ocupación hospitalaria muy baja", "este es un éxito colectivo".

Well, we do not doubt that the Dominican Republic has one of the lowest mortality rates due to Covid in the world, Well there people don't die from Covid, they die from the vaccine.

Something is brewing, stay tuned.

[END OF EDITION]

Years ago I went to visit a doctor who prescribed me a medication to help me with a problem I had on my hands, Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. It's been so many years since that that I don't remember the name of the medication, but what I can't forget is that it almost killed me, since I had a very strong allergic reaction. That was the first and last time that I took it, and that's why I'm alive to tell you about it. Take notes.

Hoy día la gente está haciendo grandes filas y se está vacunando por manadas, para bien o para mal, mas al parecer "nobody knows" si es para bien o para mal que se están inyectando en su brazo. Creen que para bien, pero no saben. Y saber y creer no es lo mismo, amigo lector. Siga tomando notas.

Last week I had the opportunity to speak with an elderly man, of Dominican nationality, he and his wife, who told me that they had already been vaccinated, because "hay que vacunarse." When I asked them which vaccine they had received, the man told me "la de Moderna." When I asked him if he knew that Moderna, as its name indicates, is such a modern company that it had never put a single drug on the market, of any kind, and that with this vaccine they make their debut in the world of Medicine. The man, with a surprised face, told me: "yo no sabía eso."

Y no lo sabía porque eso "nadie" lo anda diciendo. A Moderna, en particular, la comenzaron a mencionar en los medios de comunicación como si hubiese sido una compañía establecida ya con muchas decadas en la industria, como si tuviera una gama de productos que todo el mundo conoce. En fín, una marca que—como dice el slogan de Goya, "tiene que ser buena." Y el presidente de República Dominicana, Luis Abinader Crown, dijo anteriormente: "tenemos vacunas de calidad".

Entonces tenemos que ModernaTX es una pionera en la technología ARNm con que se derrollaron las vacunas de Pfizer y Moderna misma. Y usted dirá, "bueno, eso es algo muy importante". El problema aquí, amigo lector, como veremos en unos momentos, es que esta tecnología del ARNm nunca se ha utilizado en humanos, y siempre ha fallado en animales. Moderna—a la par con esta tecnología del ARNm, hacen su debut en la medicina, como ya mencioné anteriormente.

Según la misma decripción que ellos hacen en su página web, Moderna fue "fundada en el 2010″ y su trabajo ha sido exclusivamente en el area de "desarrollo y descubrimiento de nuevas drogas" y de la tecnología del ARN mensajero (ARNm) o mRNA, por sus siglas en Inglés. Por lo que podemos ver, ellos son dueños de varias patentes en relación a esta tecnología. El asunto es que con su vacuna del Covid y la de Pfizer, esta es la primera vez que ponen en el mercado un producto o que su tecnología sea usada en un producto aprobado en la industria médica. ^[m]2Moderna's Patent Estate: Messenger RNA Technologies (mRNA) & Delivery Technologies
[LINK, Moderna] ^[m]3Moderna, About Us — About Moderna
LINK, Modern]

For an entire decade—according to them, ModernaTX has been experimenting to get to this moment, and apparently it has not wasted the opportunity. The time has come, and as if by magic, this pharmaceutical company appears and enters through the front door, the largest of all.

No matter how much we searched on their website or on the Internet, we could not find a single Moderna product on the market, outside of the new vaccine and its vaccine technology. messenger RNA, which according to them "da instrucciones de tiempo real para crear las proteínas necesarias para guiar todos los aspectos de la biología" y que "es el software de la vida." Software? MMM…

Desde el 2010 al 2021 hay menos de 11 años de esta compañía ser establecida. Y ahora de repente es una pionera en el desarrollo de la vacuna más importante y compleja de la historia, contra el virus "más potente", "peligroso", y "mortal" que la humanidad jamás haya visto. Bueno, por lo menos así es que lo presentan en TV y todos los grandes medios de comunicación de este tiempo.

Pfizer, en la otra esquina, fue fundada en 1849. Eso es 172 años hasta el día de hoy, mientras que Moderna con menos de 11 años y sin ningún producto en el mercado ya está a la par de Pfizer en este asunto, y a usted le han dicho" vacunese, que no hay nada que temer", Mmm…

On this day We are going to tell you what they have not told you, that you do not know and that almost no one tells you, but that you should know, whether you have been vaccinated or are considering doing so. But we are not going to tell you on our own, because we are not doctors or scientists, but rather we are going to show you what the manufacturers themselves say about the different vaccines offered generously and free of charge so that no one is left unvaccinated.

And we will not only hear from the manufacturers, but also from the governments and their agencies that regulate and approve these vaccines—and their ingredients, in addition to the different medical-scientific entities, medical journals, hospitals, doctors and health workers. In several areas, the press, and even the "nerds" and experts in the different specialty areas that have to do with the production and use of vaccines and the ingredients they are composed of.

And that is the point, that we investigate, inquire and ask, before we get vaccinated. Having said that, let's begin...

Well, before starting with the ingredients, it would be good to review some of the attributions on social networks that are being made to the different vaccines. The doctors Christiane Northrup , Carrie Madej and Chinda Brandolino, among other medical professionals, have denounced that these vaccines come to modify our DNA and they will even affect the way we think.

Dr. Christiane Northrup

Dr. Carrie Madej

Michael Yeadon, former Pfizer executive and scientist (until 2011), said that particular vaccine "podría causar infertilidad" in both men and women, ^[1]aThe ex-Pfizer scientist who became an anti-vax-hero.
[NEWS, Reuters] que estas han sido creadas para traer un genocidio a la humanidad. Que "no necesitamos esuchar a oficiales del gobierno y científicos corruptos." Y que todo este asunto de la pandemia es "una estupidez," que "todo es mentira". Son palabras fuertes y antes de que termine este estudio (completo) sus palabras serán puestas bajo el escrutino de la lupa. ^{[1 B}Michael Yeadon continues to warn the world.
[VIDEO 00:03:04, TeamJesus]

En sus propias palabras, Michael Yeadon no solo te dice que "todo es una mentira," sino que incluso que es "imposible". Y este se ñor dirigió el Department of Allergies and Respiratory Diseases from Pfizer. I hope you don't already forget to take notes.

The molecular biologist, Professor Dolores Cahill, de Irlanda, denunció que se debe llevar a la justicia a aquellos profesionales médicos, científicos y ministros del gobierno que están recomendando el distanciamiento social y el uso de mascarillas para combatir el "Covid-19″, pues ella menciona que los coronavirus no se esparcen vía aerea.

Cahill also warned that the vaccine It will kill a lot of people within a few months.

And many out there claim that this is already happening, and that the deaths, after being vaccinated, have not been long in coming. Dana Ashely reports on the adverse effects of 81 people who were vaccinated, among whom there are several deaths (ENGLISH).^[2]Looking Into The Lives Of 81 People Who Took The J@b
[VIDEO 00:54:05, BitChut]

Ahora bien, lo interesenta es que Anthony Fauci—"El hombre más poderoso del planeta", nos dice que las máscarillas—tal como dijo Dolores Cahill, no sirven para casi practicamente nada, en este caso. Él es el director del Instituto Nacional Para Control de Enfermedades Infecciosas de Estados Unidos, y es la mano derecha y acesor médico del Presidente Biden, particularmente en este asunto de la "pandemia'.

Fauci es una persona super controversial, pues constantemente se contradice. Hoy día anda diciendo que uses dos o tres máscarrillas para protegerte del Coronavirus. ¿Será que en menos de un año la ciencia ha cambiado? Es eso precisamente lo que Michael Yeadon señala, que desde el 2020 para acá tenemos una nueva "ciencia", que no tiene nada de ciencia.

Dolores Cahill, who deciphered the proteins of the human body, worked on the creation of the meningitis vaccine, y—quien sabe lo que dice, nos dijo también que "nuestro sistema inmunológico se fortalece cuando estamos cerca y compartimos en hermandad," no en un distanciamiento social. Todo aquel que sabe lo más básico de inmunología y virus, sabe eso, mas Fauci… bueno, dejemos que él mismo nos explique…

Fauci told us in March 2020 that we should not take any Covid tests, otherwise we are sick.

Una vez más, Michael Yeadon dijo si no tienes síntomas es porque no estás enfermo, y una persona que no está enferma no puede enfermar a otra. Sin embargo, Fauci hoy manda a todo el mundo, "enfermos" y sanos a hacerse la PCR test, la cuál se usa para detectar el "Covid-19″. Prueba que, sino la tienes, no te puedes montar en un avión hoy, y prueba que—según su mismo inventor, Kary Mullis,  It should not be used to detect infectious diseases or any type, as that is not its correct use. 

And Mullis has interesting things to say about Anthony Fauci…

Northrup, Madej and others say they will put us in nanorobots to monitor and control us. A number of adverse effects have also been reported, such as seizures, severe skin allergies, partial and total paralysis of several patients who have been vaccinated, and thousands of other adverse effects.

And all this while governments and the media tell us:

You can turn on subtitles to see the translation. But here we have the transcript of this informative message, broadcast in the media by the Department of Health of the State of New Jersey:

A vaccine generally takes 10 to 15 years to develop and deploy. And here the doctor Meg Fisher explains to us why this vaccine came out in less than a year: "debido a la urgencia de la pandemia" and—could not miss, "debido a la extraordinaria colaboración de científicos dedicados de todo el mundo."

And we imagine that there has never been any other global health emergency in the world, right? And how about the pandemic of AIDS, Diabetes, Cancer, and Heart diseases, Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease that kill millions of people every year around the world? And what about hunger... why hasn't a vaccine been invented against it? MMM…

With the money being spent on these vaccines, world hunger will end. It is obvious that this so-called doctor Meg Fisher is not only reading what he is saying, but he knows very well that he is lying, o simplemente ni siquiera sabe en donde está parada. ¿Conque debido a la urgencia de una "enfermedad" se puede accelerar la ciencia? Algo que científicamente se toma entre 10 y 15 años en desarrollar ahora se hace en menos de un año debido a la urgencia de esta "pandemia"… where is the science behind that science?

Now, here there is a contradiction to what Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen themselves have published in the Fact Sheet of the different vaccines, which the FDA approved. Let's go back to analyze what it says on pages 1 and 6, for Pfizer BionNTech.

The first excerpt reads this way:

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine It is an unapproved vaccine that can prevent COVID-19. There is no FDA-approved vaccine to prevent COVID-19.

This no longer needs explanation. And the second extract (p.6) says the following:

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine has not undergone the same type of review than an FDA approved or cleared product. The FDA may issue an EUA [emergency use authorization] When certain criteria are met, including that there are no suitable, approved alternatives and available.

Primero, la doctora Dolores Cahill presentó un par de fármacos que la misma ciencia ha aprobado para combatir coronavriuses en el pasado. Segundo, claramente vemos que esta vacuna "autorizada para uso de emergencia" no cumple con los mismos requisitos de estricto escrutinio que una vacuna aprobada, siguiendo los mismos estándares conocidos: "10-15 años de rigurosa investigación y desarrollo." 

And third, the description is very clear, a vaccine is authorized for emergency use "cwhen certain criteria are met." And certain criteria do not sound like many criteria, much less all the criteria. That is, only the basics have been considered and not the extensive to authorize these vaccines. There is nothing rigorous here, as Meg Fisher said.

A couple of days ago I heard this Dr. Fisher commercial on the radio again, and now at the end they added that the vaccine "is overwelmingly safe." That is to say, "abrumadoramente segura." I'm not going to swear, but I don't think that has ever been said about any medication in the history of humanity. And if that has been said, it is false. If this vaccine is overwhelmingly safe, then there should be no adverse effects of any kind, much less death.

The news portal NJ.com based in New Jersey, gives us the same message: 

"Y los expertos dicen que aquellos que pueden darse el lujo de tomarse un día libre deberían considerar hacerlo, aunque las vacunas han demostrado ser abrumadoramente seguras." —NJ.com ^[3]aCOVID-19 Vaccines: "Overwhelmengly safe"
[LINK, NJ.com]

"And experts say those who can afford to take a day off might want to consider doing so, although the vaccines have proven to be overwhelmingly safe."  —NJ.com 

And other media outlets have joined the dance:

And NBC News tells us:

"The Covid vaccine is safe, Whatever the anti-vaccines say. Here's why we can trust it." […]
"The Covid vaccine is safe, whatever anti-vaxxers say. Here’s why we can trust it." […] —NBC News ^[3]dCOVID-19 Vaccines: "Overwhelmengly safe"
[LINK, NBC News]

Lo bueno de este asunto es que aquí estamos mostrando la evidencia de los pro vacunas—es decir, ¡las evidencias de ellos mismos!

Now, we are told so many times that these vaccines are so safe that this should make you think. If a product is good, there is no need to repeat it so many times. We understand the concept of marketing, but we are talking about something that is supposedly good. And if it's so good, why does it have to be reemphasized so many times? Could it be that it's not that good? Have you considered that?

This is like when a child comes up to you and says: "mami, no fuí yo que me comí todo el chocolate en la cocina" while at the same time his entire face is covered in chocolate. I already mentioned that it is to the vaccine manufacturers and the agencies that certify them that we should ask about the safety of these vaccines, well—after all, they are the ones who make them. And in part two of this study we'll get right into that. But we still need a group to ask: the patients, and here I leave one of them:

And to you who are reading this we extend the same invitation that the Texas state senator did. Bob Hall take a walk through the database VAERS from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), donde ya hay más de 4 mil fatalidades reportdas por causa de estas vacunas. Y VAERS, como Hall explica, es en realidad menos de un por ciento de lo que realmente sucede", pues la mayoría de los casos no son reportados, ya que la mayoría de la gente ni siquiera conoce la existencia de VAERS.

The video presents instructions on how to access and search the VAERS database. But, so that you have a clearer idea of what is being talked about here, here we show you the statistics of Adverse Events and Deaths reported to VAERS, until today (May 29, 2021).

1. Adverse Events: ALL (including death)

2. Adverse Events: DEATH (Only)

3. Adverse Events: DEATH (Description)

At the time of writing this analysis we do not have the time to translate these documents. But you can copy any part of the text and paste it into Google Translate to translate it. For now we refer to some cases...

Looking at the first table, it gives us the total of 223,723 Reported events of adverse effects, including deaths, presumably due to the vaccine. We see the "onset interval" which gives us the amount of time (days) that passed between the vaccine and the death of the vaccinated person. We also have "recovered" which tells us if the vaccinated person recovered from the adverse effect. 

In the second table we have a total of 4,080 deaths reported due to the vaccine, until now. The amount of time that passed between the vaccine and the individual's death paints a clearer picture of how many of these deaths could be directly associated with the vaccine received.

In table no. 3 we see the description of some reports of people who died within a very short period of time after receiving the vaccine. We see cases that just 30 minutes after being vaccinated became seriously ill and died. Others just two or three hours away, and many within a few days of receiving the shot. These are just a few cases of the thousands reported. Note that most of these cases have been reported by workers in health care agencies, nursing homes, and even hospitals.

These tables present some of the first cases reported in 2021. Remember that the elderly were the first group to qualify to receive the vaccine. So it makes sense that if they were the first to be vaccinated, they would also be the first to exhibit the side effects of the vaccine. However, among our small list we have a case of a 49-year-old gentleman, in good health, who died about 4 hours after receiving the vaccine. The brother of the deceased reports the event and complains that the hospital did not report this case to VAERS.

Let's be reasonable, if a healthy person gets vaccinated and dies a few minutes or a few hours or a few days after receiving the dose in their arm, the probability rate that the death was caused by the vaccine would be—logically, very high or by the least highly suspicious. Even an already sick person who becomes seriously ill or dies just after being vaccinated, Would you isolate this event from the vaccine completely? There are people with cancer who do not die of cancer, but die in a car accident; keep that in mind.

You can also access the VAERS database by visiting the following link www.wonder.cdc.com/vaers.html ^[4]aVAERS, Search — Navigation and search
[LINK, CDC] Just make sure you click on the button that says I Agree, just below the section Disclaimer. Then click on the button that says VAERS Data Search. In Bob Hall's video we present a visual tour of how to navigate VAERS.

In 2012, the United Nations Organization (UN) left us the following message:

So the earth can no longer support the large number of people who live on it, huh? ¿"Algo tiene que ceder." "Yo he vivido una buena vida."?

¿No les parece esto como un mensaje de despedida? Note que al principio cuando dice "la tierra ya no puede aguantar la cantidad de gente que vive en ella", ahí presentan a sequence of several shots of elderly peoples. That is to say, In this land there is now room for the elderly. That video was published in 2012—the 12th year of this millennium. Flip those digits and you will not only get the number of UN Agenda 21, sino también al año 21; año en que muchos que vivieron una buena vida "se despidieron"—y se siguen despidiendo, para siempre.

Bill Gates, the great Microsoft—and vaccine nerd—has repeated for many years this message that the earth can no longer support any more people, and that the world's population must be reduced. And how does he plan to achieve that?

Ese fue el ex presidente de Estados Unidos Eisenhower advirtiendo del "peligro de que la política pública llegue a ser captiva de una élite tecnológica y científica", seguido por las ya legendarias palabras de Bill Gates:

"Primero tenemos the population [WE]…the world currently has 6.8 billion people. It is on track to reach 9 billion [9 Billion]. Now, If we do a great job on new vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, We could decrease that figure perhaps 10 or 15%."

Draw your own conclusions.

Let us not forget the words of Bob Hall, which in turn are a consensus that the number of cases usually reported to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System) — Vaccine Adverse Reporting System, which—generally, are less than 1%. That is, if only 1% of the cases are reported, we could assume/estimate/deduce, without necessarily speculating, which until now really there would be just over 408,000 deaths (minus a small margin of error) because of vaccines and not 4,080.

The CDC reports so far 590,212 deaths in the United States of Covid-19. ^[4]bCOVID Data Tracker — COVID Data Tracker: Cases and Deaths
[LINK, CDC]  In other words, there would only be approximately a 31% difference between the reported number of deaths attributed to Covid-19 (590,212) compared to possible deaths due to vaccines (408,000 less margin of error). This number is just an estimate, but we understand that it is not far from reality.

Y sí, "las vacunas son abrumadoramente seguras"…

So here we have two opposing messages, coming from the same source, and regarding the same information, since NJ Health (New Jersey Department of Health) is under the jurisdiction of HHS (Dept. of Health and Human Services). ) of the United States Government, which in turn operates the FDA, which authorized the vaccine for emergency use. While on the one hand the CDC and the main health associations tell us in front of the cameras—or the radio, or the official machinery of social networks, such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, etc., that the vaccine is super safe, while the same VAERS page that the CDC itself administers contradicts this.

The following case happened in Honduras, and was reported by the Telemundo network.

No es muy común que este tipo de noticias que cuele en los medios de comuniación de la élite, pero de vez en cuando se cuelan, aunque en la mayoría de los casos siempre traen a un "experto" a "explicarnos" lo que no necesita explicación. En otras ocasiones es solo un caso de "oposición controlada". Y Telemundo es propiedad de la cadena NBC, la misma que nos dijo: "las vacunas son seguras, digan lo que digan los anti-vacunas." Una vez más, estamos presentando lo reportado por los pro-vacunas.

Los documentos oficiales de autorización de la FDA y de las farmaceuticas que las producen nos dicen que esta vacuna es "investigacional", mas el gobierno y hospitales como Denver Health a usted y a mí nos siguen diciendo por los medios de comunicación, que…

"Covid vaccines are safe and they work" is the resonant message in this video, which we translate "las vacunas del Covid-19 son seguras y trabajan". Well, we will explore that in a moment when we delve fully into the list of ingredients that these vaccines contain, and the testimonies and news of people who have had it.

As for side effects, the CDC has this to say:

This is a vile lie from the CDC. A side (adverse) effect is not a sign that the body is generating protection, It is a sign that the body is rejecting that medication, and only once the medicine has subdued the body does it stop fighting it. If what the CDC says were true, then drug makers would make sure to put very harmful substances in there to create as many side effects as possible. As far as we understand, vaccine developers try to minimize the adverse effects of each drug. Or is it not like that? So, how to try to minimize what generates protection for the body? 

Another point, when a person dies from a vaccine, do their symptoms disappear within a few days? Death, dear reader, is also a symptom, do not forget that.

And to close this point with a flourish, the CDC says that "algunas personas no presentan efectos secundarios". So, WE ASK, will such people not receive protection? And weren't side effects a sign that the body was developing protection? This whole story just doesn't add up.

We hope that with the presentation of the scientific evidence, which in this case will be the tests, all these and other allegations—from one side and the other—will be clarified, either verifying or denying the information attributed regarding the safety of these vaccines. .

Estamos separando el mito de la realidad, y es nuestro propósito presentarles la verdad. Y para eso—nuevamente, exploraremos las fuentes de los que nos están diciendo "vacunate, que no hay nada que temer," pues entendemos que If they created these vaccines, they are the best ones to answer any questions about them. Y entendemos que ellos "tienen" la verdad, solo que al parecer han sido mal entendidos, o—quizás, mal investigados.

Again, the list of ingredients published by the different manufacturers of the vaccines that we will cover. Don't be scared by those scientific names, and take a minute or two to look at each ingredient so that you become familiar with them, and then we will go into detail, as we will explain them in a simple and direct way.

If you checked the ingredients you have probably noticed that some are repeated between the different vaccines. There are others that are also repeated, but with different names. We will make those connections. This information is very important, since each vaccine contains ingredients that separate it from the others, but it definitely has ingredients in common that, for better or worse, unite them. 

We cannot analyze these ingredients without first knowing what vaccines are. Let the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention help us with the answer.

A decir por esta declaración pordemos asumir—y hasta afirmar, que las vacunas están diseñadas para salvar vidas. Y aunque Pfizer y Moderna claman que sus vacunas no contienen el "virus", ahí mismo dice que después de una persona ser vacunada, desarrolla inmunidad. ¿Y qué tiene que decir al respecto el gran Anthony Fauci?

Vaccine failure? Getting sick even after getting vaccinated? Why do I get vaccinated then?

 En los mismos reportes de VAERS vimos varios casos de personas enfermarse de "Covid" aún después de vacunarse. ¿Recuerdan las palabras de Kary Mullis de que "si lo haces bien, usted puede contraer (DETECTAR) casi cualquier cosa en cualquier persona"? y la doctora María José de España nos dice que en Australia la Universidad de Queensland paralizó un proyecto de una vacuna Covid-19 porque los pacientes "estaban dando positvos al virus del VIH."

The scientific magazine Science The Wire reported this news. They note that this 1 Billion dollar project failed after this vaccine gave many false positives for HIV. However, Dr. María José ruled—and cited other doctors and scientists—alleging that these were not false positives, but rather that this vaccine contained a spike (S) protein that has an HIV sequence that "ataca los leucocitos", which defend the body from infections. And if the body's defenses are destroyed... well, let's leave that matter at that.

It is easier for them to say that the vaccine gave many false positives than that many tested positive because of the false vaccine. And that is the same or a simliar spike protein that we have in the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, found in the first ingredient on our list: the messenger RNA. That gives a lot to think about. ^[7]Why Queensland University Covid-19 Vaccine Failed
[VIDEO 00:07:34, Canal5TV]

María José también mencionó que "desde el 9 de Diciembre (2020) al 26 de Enero (2021)" ya se habían reportado unos "70,000 efectos adversos graves de esta vacuna, INCLUYENDO MUERTE Y CEGUERA.. Y sí, "Las vacunas Covid-19 son seguras…"

Ya vamos canlentando los motores, pues vamos entrando de lleno en materia de ingredientes, pero esta base era necesaría y usted comprenderá mejor el porqué según vayemos avanzado. Por lo pronto ya usted debe empezar a reconocer que "no todo lo que brilla es oro." Y es el "oro" al que pasaremos por el fuego para saber si es real o fantasía.

We already mentioned about the process and the time it takes to create a vaccine, and here we have the official information. The History of Vaccines portal, whom the CDC cites in its publications, gives us the answer:

To save time, when certain information is a bit extensive, we will collapse it into an expandable table, as we will point out the most important things, when necessary. But it will be there if you need it. As you may have noticed, the little blue numbers take us to the direct sources, which are also presented in the footer of this article. 

De aquí podemos sacar que la vacuna del ARN mensajero "trata la enfermedad del Covid 19″. Y ya que Covid-19 es clasificada como una nueva enfermedad, se está tratando con una nueva vacuna. Todo lo que estamos viendo es nuevo, nunca se había hecho antes. Todo lo que estamos presentando es simplemente la información pública, tal y como está escrita, y cuando es necesario damos nuestra perspectiva personal, pero siempre derivandose de lo que ya se ha dicho o comprobado.

So much for the information on the classification of vaccines and what they are supposed to do. Now let's focus on the ingredients of these vaccines manufactured for Covid-19 and what they really do or can do. To do this, we will also extract information directly from government institutions and/or well-established medical and scientific organizations and/or health services around the world, in addition to the main media, as we have already shown. We will not leave any room for conspiracy theories or what many call doubt.

THE INGREDIENTS

It's interesting, but on page 3 of the Pfizer BionTech Emergency Use Authorization Fact Sheet we have the following question, which we also find in the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Letter:

The Moderna vaccine presents the same question and answer, on page 2. The following photo gallery extracts a paragraph from the various emergency use authorization letters for three of our vaccines in question.

How can we appreciate these three vaccines have not been approved, but they are in the research stage (experimental). They have been authorized for emergency use, which is not the same, because as we already covered above, the process of developing and deploying a vaccine takes between 10 to 15 years, while these vaccines—each one of them, has come on the market With less than a year of study and development, Mmm…

Here I leave you the official authorization letter from the FDA for emergency use of each of these vaccines. These are the ones that are currently [at the time of writing] authorized in the United States.

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine USA Letter of Authorization (p.2 ¶2) ^[9]aPfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Letter of Authorization
[DOCUMENT, FDA]

ModernaTX COVID-19 Vaccine USA Letter of Authorization (p.1 ¶4) ^[9]bModerna COVID-19 Vaccine USA Letter
[DOCUMENT, FDA]

Janssen Biotech USA Letter of Authorization, (p.1 ¶3) ^[9]cJanssen Biotech USA Letter of Authorization reissued 02-25-2021, (p.1 ¶3)
[DOCUMENT, J&J]

To get a clearer picture of what emergency use authorization means, let's extract one more paragraph from the Pfizer Emergency Use Authorized Vaccine Fact Sheet, which we mentioned a little above, page 6.

As I mentioned before, it is the manufacturers of these vaccines and the government agencies that authorize or approve them that we must ask to obtain clear answers about everything we need to know about these vaccines. Now let's focus on the ingredients.

Looking at our ingredients table, we see that The first on the list is messenger RNA (mRNA) that both vaccines—the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines—have in their formulation. Pfizer describes it this way on its website: ^[10]The Facts About The Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine
[VIDEO 2:32:55, CristoVerdad]

"2. How does an mRNA vaccine work?
mRNA, which is sent to the body's cells using lipid nanoparticles, instructs cells to generate the spike protein found on the surface of the new coronavirus that initiates infection. Instructing to cells to generate the spike protein to stimulate an immune response, including the generation of antibodies specific to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

mRNA vaccines do not contain virus particles, lo que significa que no contienen partes debilitadas o muertas de un virus o bacteria."

"3. ¿Las vacunas de ARNm cambian el ADN de una persona?
mRNA is a transient carrier of information that does not integrate into human DNA. El ARNm no ingresa al núcleo de una célula, que es donde se guarda nuestro ADN."

On its website, Pfizer tells us that its Covid-19 vaccine is not approved and gives us the list of ingredients—starting with messenger RNA. Here we see, according to them, that mRNA is a carrier of a biological message at the cellular level. They also tell us that this mRNA does not alter our DNA.

Carrie Madej y Christiane Northrup, entre otros, dijeron que este ARNm "cambiará fundamentalmente nuestro ADN" y seremos—una vez vacunados, seres genéticamente modificados (GMO), como se hace con algunos alimentos y animales. Pfizer y las demás manufacturadoras lo niegan. Pero recordemos que el ARNm lleva un mensaje, mas no es el mensaje (sus ingredientes). El ARNm es simplemente el vehículo en que estos ingredientes son transportados (nanopartículas lípidas) con el fin de que nuestro organismo no los reconozca como agentes externos y los ataque y destruya. Para entender esto, hay que conocer ese mensaje, que más adelante abarcaremos.

Por lo pronto, La cadena de TV PBS, una institución "sin fines de lucros" fundada por el congreso de Estados Unidos, lo define de esta manera:

Needless to say, this appears to be a very dangerous process, since synthetic material is being inserted into living organisms, particularly human beings. And that is what doctors Christiane Northrup and Carrie Madej were referring to when they mentioned nanoparticles or nanorobots.

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York defines mRNA this way:

And the CDC gives us the essential description of what the messenger RNA vaccine is:

That is the same spike mentioned in the Australian vaccine that was suspended, which Dr. María José mentioned. Such a dangerous spike, since it is a synthetic protein, which can cause almost any type of disease in the human body, as the doctor states. Sherry Tenpenny, with "más de  40,00 horas de investigación personal" on vaccines, who testified on the matter (June 8, 2021) before the OHIO State Congress (USA) on the Bill SUB.HB NO.248, where she, joining and quoting doctors Byram Bridle (Associate Professor of Viral Immunology, Guelph Veterinary College of Ontario), Peter McCullough (Clinical Professor, Texas A&M Univ.), Ryan Cole (Idaho, USA), and Michael Yeadon, spoke the following words:

Y después de estas declaraciones, obviamente, no se hicieron esperar los ataques de los ya mundialmente famosos jueces de "la verdad"; es decir, los "fact checkers" o verificadores de datos. Un poco más adenlante en este estudio verificaremos a estos verificadores de dato o instituciones "independientes", pues ellos se han convertido en una pieza clave de toda esta narrativa. Pero por el momento toquemos uno de ellos, brevemente, FactCheck.org: ^[12]fIdaho Doctor Makes Baseless Claims About Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines [LINK, FactCheck.org]

"Un video viral muestra a un médico [Ryan Cole] making dubious claims about vacciness and COVID-19 treatments at a forum hosted by Idaho's lieutenant governor. Dr. Ryan Cole says that mRNA vaccines cause cancer and autoimmune diseases, pero el autor principal del artículo en el que Cole basó esa afirmación nos dijo que no hay evidencia de que las vacunas de ARNm causen esas dolencias." —FactCheck.org in response to statements by Dr. Ryan Cole

"A viral video features a doctor making dubious claims about COVID-19 vaccines and treatments at a forum hosted by Idaho’s lieutenant governor. Dr. Ryan Cole claims mRNA vaccines cause cancer and autoimmune diseases, but the lead author of the paper on which Cole based that claim told us there is no evidence mRNA vaccines cause those ailments." —FactCheck.org in response to Ryan Cole's remarks

Just a word to our friends at FactCheck.org,

• hydroxybutyl (hydroxybutyl)

FactCheck.org check your sources, please. No more comments!

And more than creating a synthetic protein in our body, mRNA brings a synthetic protein for the human organism to interact with. Yes, on the one hand they tell us that mRNA leads the organism to produce this protein, but nevertheless the chemical laboratory SignaChem gives us the Spike Protein Safety Information Sheet. That is, this protein is already designed synthetically from a laboratory. ^[S]1SPIKE Protein, SignalChem [LINK, SignChem]

If you look at the list of ingredients of this protein (Art. 3) you will notice that it is composed of several ingredients: Sodium chloride (NaCI), Imidazole (1,3-Diaza-2,4-cyclopentadiene), Dibasic Sodium Phosphate (Sodium Phosphate, Dibasic), and Protein. The protein is not defined here, but Sodium Chloride and Dibasic Sodium Phosphate are part of the list of Ingredients published by the manufacturers of some of these vaccines.

IMIDAZOLE is not part of the list they gave us, but here we see that it is a component of the Spike Protein, which they did give us, and it is found in the messenger RNA. The spike proteins of viruses are the channel through which they attack the organism. That in itself is alarming enough, but here we have something even greater, because it is a synthetic protein, and that is why we see, to a large extent, these vaccines causing so much damage.

Let's see what the National Library of Medicine tells us about Imidazole...

GHS Hazard Statements

• Signal: Danger
• H302: Harmful if swallowed [Warning Acute toxicity, oral]
• H314: Causes severe skin burns and eye damage [Skin hazard
  corrosion/irritation
• H360D: May harm the unborn child [Danger Reproductive Toxicity]

So That's part of the mission of messenger RNA, to produce this artificial protein in our body, which damages our body—and the little bodies, in case you haven't noticed. And since messenger RNA is the carrier of all the ingredients in vaccines, in order to do it true justice, we will return later, and here we mention it first, since it is the first on the list of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines, the first to be authorized in the United States.

You can do more research on messenger RNA, as there is quite a bit of information out there. For now, let's take a closer look at the consequences of using synthetic materials on living beings.

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and the National Library of Medicine (USA) make similar points. ^[13]bWorst risks of synthetic biology for humanity
[LINK, MIT] ^[13]cRisk in synthetic biology—views from the lab
[LINK, PMC]

Undoubtedly, synthetic biology is harmful to humans, la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina lo reconoce. Y aunque esto no es exclusivo de las vacunas ARNm del Covid-19, lo cierto es que ellas contienen partículas sintéticas, unas "50 billones" según mencionó la doctora Tenpenny, y eso causa perjuicios a la salud, y usted debe saberlo. Lo interesante es que esta noticia viene de la página web del Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), one of the pillar universities in technology worldwide. One of the Universities or Institutes where the technology that transports messenger RNA was developed, as mentioned by Dr. Christiane Northrup in her video. But why is this important? Let's see…

To begin with, as we already mentioned, messenger RNA is a synthetic technology, which transports the ingredients of the vaccine to places in the body never before possible, as we explained previously. And he does it using nanoparticles—or nano robots que tanto la doctora Carrie Madej como Northrup mencionaron. Esto parece ciencia ficción, pero no lo es; así está de avanzada la ciencia. Esto es tan complejo como funciona que usted tiene que verlo para creerlo. El problema es, que—como su nombre lo dice, estos son nanorobots tan pequeños que no son visibles ante el ojo humano. Su tamaño es "un billón de un metro". Sin embargo, hay bastante información al respecto. Aquí dejo algunos videos de expertos explicando la nanotecnología…

That's Jay Walker, CEO of ApiJect, a company that develops nanotechnology for vaccines. According to him, all this technology is optional. FALSE, no one has been asked if they agree with what is in these vaccines, and they have definitely not told them everything that is in them, much less give us the choice between a vaccine with nanotechnology or one without it.

Walker says vaccines contain RF computer chips que solo almacena la información de la dósis de la vacuna". Eso también es mentira; una vez inyectdado usted puede ser rastreado dondequiera que se meta, pues está información es accesada remotamente vía Wifi y la tecnología 5G. Eso de que hoy día a usted le pidan la tarjeta de vacunación para participar en casi todos los ámbitos de la sociedad, es solo una distracción, y es temporaría. Créame, que en un momento de persecución, ellos no le preguntarán por su tarjea, sino que llegarán directamente a donde usted esté ubicado, pues una vez vacunado usted es una antena o GPS ambulante, tal como señaló Christiane Northrup.

Now, let's dive right into what Northrup and Madej mentioned about how this technology will be used to control us. First, it is necessary to understand that there are several patents that have to do with minipulation of the nervous system (Our brain). One of them is patent 6506148 through the use of electromagnetic fields, via screens and computer devices (TV, monitors, cell phones, etc.). That is, it is an attack (manipulation) from the outside in.

From the outside, not only through the propagations, called programs, that lead human beings to believe any story that anyone invents, but also through the use of visual frequencies of these magnetic fields (light, colors, audio, etc.) of these devices. By emitting radial waves (magnetic fields) the behavior of human beings can be altered.  ^[4]aNervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors
[VIDEO 2:32:55, CristoVerdad]

Its inventor is Hendricus G. Loos, who is said (not confirmed) to have worked for DARPA and the CIA, and owns several patents that have to do with the manipulation of the nervous system—our mind. Another patent that caught my attention was the patent 6238333. ^[14]bNervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors
[LINK, JUSTIA Patents]

Now do you understand why there are magnets and metals in vaccines? Still don't understand?

And you say, what does all this have to do with the vaccine? Well, EVERYTHING, and later we will see how some of the ingredients are toxic metals. With these patents for manipulating the nervous system, they manipulate or control what is inside, our body, and—particularly our daughters—from the outside. Stefano Manotari Mentioned it.

The world elite wants to control everyone, but we know that they cannot vaccinate everyone. We recently received news that meats sold in supermarkets are also exhibiting magnetic properties. This makes sense now, because what we are seeing is that you don't have to vaccinate everyone to vaccinate everyone, if you can understand what I mean.

Nuestro sistema inmunológico es una maravilla de la creación de Dios, y los que están detrás de estas vacunas lo saben. Por eso estamos siendo bombardeados por todos los frentes, para someternos tanto física como mentalmente. Y a los que no se sometan…. Bueno, el siguiente video está subtitulado (autotraducido), pero como dice un dicho popular "una imagen vale más que mil palabras."

Jay Walker said he obtained a contract with the Donald Trump Administration. He added that "es un acuerdo público-privado entre mi compañía ApiJect Systems of America y el Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos, y el Departamento de Defensa" and that these nanochips only contain information about the vaccine. Gentlemen, the United States Department of Defense, in case you didn't know, is a military agency.. What is the military doing administering matters that have to do with the health of the general public? As far as we understand, the defense department of a country manages the weapons of that country, both to defend how to attack. And here we see him handling a vaccine. That's interesting, and the FDA confirmed Mr. Walker's words. ^[15]a Company Says It Can Help Mass Produce Coronavirus Vaccine | NBC Nightly News
[VIDEO 00:9:09, NBC News]

Now let's see how this messenger RNA works in our body...

The title of this video is The Nano Robots Inside You, or the Nano Robots Inside You. You must activate subtitles for translation. But just by looking at the visualization you can understand almost everything you need to know. This YouTube channel is called World Science Festival, and the host, journalist Robert Krulwich of the NPR Network, begins by saying:

"I want to now go to what I think this what you are about to see… first of all what you are about to see is going on in you, first of all is happening inside of you right now, everywhere." —Robert Krulwich, NPR

We translate—

"Quiero ir ahora a lo que creo que… esto es, lo que usted está a punto de ver, primero que nada, lo que usted está a punto de ver it's already happening inside you, ahora mismo, en todas partes." —Robert Krulwich

Es interesante, pero cuando Krulwich dice "esto ya está sucendiendo dentro de usted," está diciendo que ya a muchos le han metido esos nano robots en su cuerpo sin ni siquiera darse cuenta, pues gran parte de la población mundian es muy fien a medicina convencional, y este video es de Febrero 4 del 2014. Luego nos presentan lo que sucede dentro de una célula con estas nanopartículas, usando animación tridimensional. 

Pay particular attention to this next video: "Como La Nanotecnología Puede Cambiar Tu Vida"

Artificial red and white blood cells? Are we born with artificial red and white blood cells? And it should be noted that NPR is a branch of the PBS Communication Network, founded by the United States Congress. That is to say, it is the government who is talking to you here, and not some crazy person on the street. If you can't see the danger in all this you are dead, well dead. And these are the Nerds, computer experts, and the creators of these technologies that are landing in the arms of almost every human being on this earth.

Information abounds on this topic, if you are interested in further research. But for now, let's remember that all this technology is used, in one way or another, in the Covid-19 vaccine. And it is thanks to this technology that (artificial) mRNA can work. And once again, spike protein is only possible thanks to all this technology, and some ingredients that we will mention later.

We have received several videos of people having seizures and/or developing seizures. Guillain Barre syndrome inmediatamente o poco después de haber sido vacunadas. Este síndrome afecta el sistema nervioso. Los medios de comunicación, no pudiendo evitar el tema, pues muchos videos se han hecho virales, tratan de minimizar estos incidentes, alegando que "esto son casos muy raros" y que "no se puede asegurar que fue la vacuna que lo causó." Sin embargo, solo dese un paseo por VAERS y la vacuna del Covid-19 y se dará cuenta que practicamente todas las vacunas causan este síndrome, y que ya no es tan raro como nos dicen en la TV, y—casi podríamos asegurar, que este síndrome es 100% producto de las vacunas.

Apparently this syndrome was rare in the past, but after the mRNA vaccines it has become somewhat common, don't you think?

We want to close this first part with the following: there is a very dangerous precedent with the spike protein that the manufacturers of these vaccines proudly promote. A precedent that, by the way, is interestingly recent. Below is a study and its translation on a (more) failed attempt at vaccines for coronaviruses that ended with a serious warning:

We are not going to say much, because this information is simple and direct, ^[16]aImmunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology by Getting Sick with the SARS Virus
[LINK, PubMed] 

"Se indica precaución al proceder a la aplicación de una vacuna contra el SARS-CoV en humanos."

This warning indicates that this type of vaccine (SARS-CoV) should not be used in humans, for obvious reasons. This happened in 2012, and today we are in 2021 Everyone is already injected with this vaccine with the same synthetic protein.

Lo que sucedió fue que cuando el "virus" del SARS-CoV hizo su "aparición" en Africa, se hizo provisión para una vacuna. Este estudio viene de la Universidad de Texas, y su publicación la obtenemos directamente de La Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina, Intitución que—no se si ya mencionamos, es un gremio del Gobierno de Estados Unidos. También vemos como la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) estuvo involucradada en este estudio.

Esas son las mismas intituciones de "salud" que hoy te dicen "vacúnate, que no hay nada que temer".

And in this SARS-CoV vaccine testing study, mice and jurasses were injected with a vaccine containing the spike protein or Peak Protein, as it is also known. After being injected with the vaccine, as the study says, "todos los ratones exhibieron cambios histopatológicos en los pulmones". That is, their cells were damaged and they developed chronic lung-type immunological disease. Needless to say, practically all of them died or were sacrificed to be studied. Hence the warning that coronavirus vaccines (SARS CoV) should not be used in humans, as they have always seriously failed in animal tests.

And the messenger RNA Covid-19 vaccines that are landing in the arms of almost every human being on this earth are also SARS CoV vaccines… or SARS CoV2 to be more specific, in this case.

A warning from the same government and the university that did that study, but nevertheless it is the same government that is behind this vaccine. A rooster can't crow any clearer than that... Or could it be?

The Scientist magazine and other scientific publications reported this past June 15 that it has been discovered that "la proteína espiga está asociada a aumentos repentinos de COVID-19″. Este es un caso similar a lo reportado por la doctora María José Martinez, en donde una vacuna COVID-19 en etapa de desarrollo en Australia comenzó a registrar casos positivo al virus del "VIH". Más adelante ampliaremos, pero hay una pregunta que debe hacerse ahora mismo, Does the COVID-19 virus really exist? ^[16]bSpike Protein Deletions Linked to COVID-19 Surges: Preprint
[LINK, TheScientist]

[EDITION] January 18, 2022]

Although it has been our intention to formulate and elaborate on this in the fourth part of this study, it is necessary that at this very moment we dot the i in this aspect. And for this, here we leave you a very educational video, by Dr. Samantha Bailey from New Zealand, who tells us how Coronavirus 19 came into existence, and prevalence.

If you have not stopped and watched a single one of the videos that we have been presenting, we highly recommend that you stop here and watch this video.

[END OF EDITION]

Well, you still haven't seen anything...

All of these vaccines contain ingredients that go unnoticed by everyone, since they are not listed directly, but are components of some listed ingredients. For the moment let's focus on Pfizer and Moderna, two of the reported vaccines that come with messenger RNA nanotechnology. Both contain an enzyme called LUCIFERASE. And luciferase—in turn, contains a substrate called LUCIFERINE. ^[16]cLUCIFERINA, a substrate of LUCIFERASA, Patent US10576146B2
LINK, Modern Patent]

Aunque luciferasa no es un ingrediente exclusivo de estas vacunas, los cierto es que ellas lo contienen, y tanto Pfizer como Moderna—y sus "fact checkers" lo niegan. ^[16]dWhat are the ingredients of Pfizer's covid-19 vaccines?
[LINK, RoofView] SM-102, which we will expand on later, is an ingredient that we found listed in the Moderna vaccine. For now let's look at the Information Insert Sheet from Cayman Chemicals, who sells this product. ^[16]eSM-102. Product Information, Insert
[LINK, RoofView]

"SM-102 es un amino lipido ionizable que se ha utilizado en combinación con otros lípidos en la formación
of nanoparticles. The administration of mRNA luciferase in lipid naonoparticles containing SM-102 induces
Luciferase expression liver in mice. Formulations containing SM-102 have been used in el development
de nanopartículas lípidas para la administración de vacunas basadas en ARNm." —Product Information Insert Sheet SN-102, Cayman Chemicals

Esa información está muy clara. Y aunque SM-102 solo lo encontramos en la vacuna de Moderna, ahí mismo dice "se han utilizado formulaciones que contienen SM-102 en el development of lipid nanoparticles for the administration of vaccines basadas en ARNm." And there are only two messenger RNA vaccines at the moment, Pfizer and Moderna.

Now, I already mentioned that luciferin is a substrate of luciferase. Let's see what Moderna has to say regarding its messenger mRNA vaccine, Patent US 2012/0251618 A1, Oct. 2012

"Para crear luciferina, 1 g of sodium or potassium salt of D-luciferin was dissolved in 66.6 ml of distilled phosphate buffer solutiona (DPBS), que no contenía Mg2 + o Ca2 +, para preparar una solución de 15 mg / ml. La solución se mezcló suavemente y se pasó a través de un filtro de jeringa de 0,2 μιη, antes de purgarla con nitrógeno, dividirla en alícuotas y congelarla a -80 ° C mientras se protegía de la luz tanto como fuera posible. La solución se descongeló usando un baño de agua si la luciferina no se disolvió, se mezcló suavemente y se mantuvo en hielo el día de la dosificación." —MODERNA, US PATENT US 2012/0251618 A1, Oct. 4 2012 ^[16]fMODERN | Patent US 2012/0251618 A1, Oct. 2012
[LINK, RoofView]

So we have to say that LUCIFERINE was created in a phosphate solution of 66.6 mililiters, huh? Does that number sound familiar to you? Until now we have tried not to mention much the spiritual aspect of all this that is happening, but you don't have to be religious to see that all this has a religious tone, right?

This is the first part of our study on the ingredients of the COVID-19 vaccine. From now on we accelerate and we will see that our list of ingredients becomes even dangerous, very dangerous, even "descontinuada".

Although technically speaking we only covered one ingredient, mRNA with some of its components and briefly touched on hydroxybutyl, we laid a very solid foundation that will make our job easier with the rest that we are missing, since we covered a lot of ground, given that this topic It is very broad and complex. 

Antes de finalizar este estudio (completo) regresaremos al ARNm mensajero, volveremos a tocar la proteína pico, luciferasa y ciertos "otros" elementos que componen esta tecnología y el resto de agentes químico-biológicos de todas las vacunas en nuestra lista. Sin más, nos vemos en la parte 2, y no se olvide comentar más abajo.

PART 2 Next ➟

Navigate to Part [1] What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 1
[STUDY, CristoVerdad] [2] What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 2
[STUDY, CristoVerdad] [3] What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 3
[STUDY, CristoVerdad] [4] of 4

—JOSE LUIS JAVIER

"Salid de ella, pueblo mío…" (REV. 18:4)

Share

———————————-
Join CristoVerdad. Subscribe to our new channel Vimeo Subscribe to Our Vimeo Channel. Share this invitation, and be part of our group of WhatsApp Subscribe to Our WhatsApp Group. When you subscribe, don't forget to leave us your name. Obscenities prohibited. Share and be part of the blessing.
———————————-

And you will know the truth...
—ChristTruth | http:/www.cristo Verdad.com Go to front page

NOTE: Numbers in blue brackets [ ] link to Supplementary Material.
Photos, if any, also expand the content: videos, news, links, etc.

SOURCES AND LINKS

THE INGREDIENTS

[p]1 Pfizer's Safety Data Sheet, COVID-19 Vaccine Ingredients [LINK, Pfizer]

[p]2 Pfizer's BioNtech FDA COVID-19 EUA Authorization Letter [LINK, FDA]

[m]1 Moderna: Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers

[az]1 COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZenenca (section 6.1), European Union [LINK, European Union]

[9]cJanssen Biotech USA Letter of Authorization reissued 02-25-2021, (p.1 ¶3) [DOCUMENT, J&J]

[SC]1 COVID-19 Vaccine (Vero Cell, Inactivated (Brief Edition) [DOCUMENT, CHINA]

[Sk]1 COVID-19 Vaccine (Vero Cell, Inactivated (Brief Edition) [DOCUMENT, CHINA]

PART 1

[a]1 Hydroxybutyl, Safety Data Sheet, Cayman Chemical [LINK, Cayman]

[S]1 SPIKE Protein, SignalChem [LINK, SignChem]

[S]2 SPIKE Protein: IMIDAZOLE, Safety Hazzards [LINK, PubChem]

[h]1 hydroxybutyl, Definition, National Cancer Institute [LINK, Cancer.org]

[h]2 hydroxybutyl, Definition, National Library of Medicine [LINK, PubChem]

[m]1 Moderna: Fact Sheet for Recipients and Caregivers

[m]2 Moderna's Patent Estate: Messenger RNA Technologies (mRNA) & Delivery Technologies [LINK, Moderna]

[m]3 About Moderna (English) — About Us, Moderna [LINK, Moderna]

x[1]a The ex-Pfizer scientist who became an anti-vax hero [LINK, Reuter]

[1]b Michael Yeadon continues to warn the world. [VIDEO 00:03:04, TeamJesus]

[2] Looking Into The Lives Of 81 People Who Took The J@b [VIDEO 00:54:05, BitChut]

[3]a COVID-19 Vaccines: "Overwhelmengly safe" [ENLACE, NJ.com]

[3]b COVID-19 Vaccines: "Overwhelmengly safe" [ENLACE, NJ.com Tulsa World]

[3]c COVID-19 Vaccines: "Overwhelmengly safe" [ENLACE, Nature.com]

[3]d COVID-19 Vaccines: "Overwhelmengly safe" [ENLACE, NBC News]

[4]a VAERS, Search — Navigation and search [LINK, CDC]

[4]b COVID Data Tracker — COVID Data Tracker: Cases and Deaths [LINK, CDC]

[5] COVID-19 Vaccines, Side Effects — Side Effects [LINK, CDC]

[6] VACCINES, THE BASICS, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [LINK, CDC]

x[7]Why Queensland University Covid-19 Vaccine Failed [VIDEO 00:07:34, Canal5TV]

[8] VACCINES, TIME AND PROCESS [LINK, The History of Vaccines]

[9]a Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Letter [DOCUMENT, FDA]

[9]b Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine EUA Letter [DOCUMENT, FDA]

[9]c Janssen Biotech USA Letter of Authorization [DOCUMENT, FDA]

[9]d Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) Fact Sheet of the Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine (Covid-19) [DOCUMENT, FDA]

[10]The Facts About The Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine [LINK, Pfizer]

[11] The powerful technology behind the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines [LINK, MSK Cancer Center]

[12]a What's Different About Messenger RNA (mRNA) Vaccines for COVID-19? [LINK, MSLK Cancer Center]

[12]b A Closer Look at How COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Work [LINK, CDC]

[12]t Sherry Tenpenny Testifies to Ohio Congress [LINK, MSLK Cancer Center]

[12]f Idaho Doctor Makes Baseless Claims About Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines [LINK, FactCheck.org]

[13]a Dangers of Synthetic Biology — Hazards of Synthetic Biology [LINK, Wikipedia]

[13]b Worst Risks of Synthetic Biology for Humanity [LINK, MIT]

[13]c Risk in synthetic biology—views from the lab [LINK, PMC]

[14]a Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors [VIDEO 2:32:55, CristoVerdad]

[14]b Nervous system manipulation by electromagnetic fields from monitors [LINK, JUSTIA Patents]

[15]a Company Says It Can Help Mass Produce Coronavirus Vaccine | NBC Nightly News [VIDEO 00:9:09, NBC News]

[15]b How nanotechnology helps mRNA Covid-19 vaccines work [LINK, StatNewsPatents]

[16]a Immunization with SARS Coronavirus Vaccines Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology by Getting Sick with the SARS Virus [LINK, PubMed]

[16]b Spike Protein Deletions Linked to COVID-19 Surges: Preprint [LINK, TheScientist]

[16]c LUCIFERINA, a substrate of LUCIFERASA, Patent US10576146B2 LINK, Modern Patent]

[16]d What Are The ingredients of the Pfizer Vaccine [LINK, TechoView]

[16]e SM-102. Product Information, Insert [LINK, TechoView]

[16]f MODERN | Patent US 2012/0251618 A1, Oct. 2012? [LINK, RoofView]

[L] Legal Section, “Copyright disclaimer” on copyright and fair use [LINK, CristoVerdad]

PART 2

[a]1 Hydroxybutyl, Safety Data Sheet, Cayman Chemical [LINK, Cayman]

[a]2 Rhod-2 (zananeidyl) [LINK, PubChem]

[a]3 Hexane-1,5-diol [LINK, PubChem]

[a]4 2-Hexydelcanoate [LINK, ThermoFisher [LINK, Ficher Scientific]

[a]5 Pfizer[LINK, Cayman Chem]

[h]1 Hydroxybutyl, Definition [LINK, NCI]

[h]2 Hydroxybutyl, PubChem [LINK, PubChem]

[p]1 Pfizer's Safety Data Sheet, COVID-19 Vaccine Ingredients [LINK, Pfizer]

p]1Pfizer's Safety Data Sheet, COVID-19 Vaccine Ingredients [LINK, Pfizer]

[S]1a Modern: SM-102 [LINK, Cayman Chem

[S]1b SM-102 Lipids, Cayman Chemicals [LINK, Cayman]

[S]1c SM-102: heptadecan-9-yl 8-{ {2-hyd roxyethyl){6-oxo-6-{undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate [LINK, DSH.ca]

[S]1d COVID Vaccines: Updates on Allergic Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions [LINK, CDC]

[S]1e Heptadecan-9-yl 8-((2-hydroxyethyl)(6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy)hexyl)amino)octanoate, 97% [LINK, BLDpharm]

[S]1f Heptadecan-9-yl 8-((2-hydroxyethyl)(6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy)hexyl)amino)octanoate [LINK, BLDpharm]

[S]1g Every Day Compound or Posison? —Regular Compound or Poison? [LINK, ReadWorks]

[S]1h SM-102 mRNA Info, MedChemExpress Website [LINK, MCE] 

[S]1i SM-102 Safety Data Sheet, MedChemExpress [LINK, MCE]

[S]1jSM-102 Info, MedKoo Biosciences, Inc. [LINK, MedKoo]

[S]1kEvery Day Compound or Posison? —Regular Compound or Poison? [LINK, ReadWorks]

[17]a ALC-0159 (PEG-2000-DMG) Safty Data Sheet [DOCUMENT, CaymanChem] 

[17]b ALC-0159 (PEG-2000-DMG) Safty Data Sheet [DOCUMENT, MCE] 

[18]a 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (Compound) Associated Disorders and Diseases [LINK, PubChem] 

[18]b SAFETY DATA SHEET: 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-PC [PAPER, Cayman Chem.]

[19]a Potassium Chloride, 12.1 NIOSH Toxicidity Data, PubChem, National Library of Medicine [LINK, PubChem NIH]

[20]a Dibasic Sodium Phospate Dihrydrate [LINK, PubChem NIH]

[19]b Dibasic Sodium Phospate Dehrydrate [LINK, Fisher Scientific]

[19]c Dibasic Sodium Phospate Dehrydrate, 2 [LINK, Mayo Clinic]

[19]d Dibasic Sodium Phospate Dehrydrate, 3 [LINK, Spectrum Chem]

[20] Michael Yeadon, Former Pfizer Executive [LINK, Reuters]

[21]a Visicol [LINK, Drugs.com]

[[21]b Visicol & OsmoRep [LINK, LA Colon & Rectal]

[22]a Sodium Chloride — Sodium Chloride [LINK, PubChem]

[22]b Sodium Chloride: Health Hazards—Sodium Chloride: Health Hazards [LINK, PubChem]

[23]a Sucrose (Sucrose), definition [LINK, HealthLine]

[23]b Sucrose (Sucrose) [LINK, PubChem]

[23]c Protein Synthesis [LINK, PubChem]

[23]d Sucrose (Sucrose), Toxicity [LINK, PubChem]

[24]a Tromethamine [LINK, PubChem]

[24]b Tromethamine, FDA Orange Book [LINK, PubChem]

[24]c Tromethamine (Tromethamine), Uses [LINK, PubChem]

[24]d Tromethamine, Storage [LINK, PubChem]

[21]e FDA Pfizer Vaccine Storage Temperature [LINK, FDA]

[21]f Tromethamine: Safety Data Sheet [LINK, CaymanChem]

[24]g Tromethamine: Acute Effects & Toxicity [LINK, Pubhem]

[24]h Ketorolac. Side Effects [LINK, RxList]

[24]i THAM THAM-E Tromethamine, Discontinued [LINK, Federal Register] [21]jTHAM THAM-E Tromethamine, Discontinued [LINK, FDA] 

[24]j THAM THAM-E Tromethamine, Discontinued [LINK, FDA] 

[24]k Tromethamine, SAFTY DATA SHEET, Pfizer [LINK, Pfizer] 

[24]l Tromethamine, MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, Pfizer [LINK, Pfizer] 

24]mReproductive Toxicity, OSHA [LINK, Pfizer]  

[25] Tromethamine Hydrochloride [LINK, PubChem]

[26] Acetic Acid, NLM, NIH [LINK, PubChem]

[27]a Sodium Acetate Trihydrate [LINK, PubChem]

[27]b Sodium Acetate Trihydrate, LINK Classification, PubChem]

[27]c Sodium Acetate Trihydrate, Safety Data Sheet LINK, PubChem] 

[27]d Sodium Acetate Trihydrate, Safety Data Sheet LINK, LabChem] 

[L] Legal Section, “Copyright disclaimer” on copyright and fair use [LINK, CristoVerdad]

PART 3 (IN DEVELOPMENT)

[28] SXXXX 

[29] XXXXX

EXTRA MATERIAL

[O]1 The Olympics, FOOTBALL, Sports and The New World Order, PART 1 — And What Does the Bible Say? [VIDEO 2l14:54]

[O]2 Las Olimpiadas, EL FÚTBOL, Los Deportes y El Nuevo Orden Mundial, PARTE 2: "Al Pueblo, Pan y Circo" [VIDEO 3:09:58, CristoVerdad]

If any of these links do not work or are incorrect, please let us know so we can correct them. If you would like to write to us, please do so using the form below; Your comment will be published. If you want to write to us privately, do so through the information section, and select contact. Thank you so much!

God bless you!

Navigate to Part [1] What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 1
[STUDY, CristoVerdad] [2] What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 2
[STUDY, CristoVerdad] [3] What's in the Vaccine: THE INGREDIENTS, Part 3
[STUDY, CristoVerdad] [4] of 4